MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4234653920 · doi:10.1002/9781118344729.ch10

Quantitative Platelet Disorders

2016· other· en· W4234653920 on OpenAlexaff
Riten Kumar, Walter H.A. Kahr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlateletMedicineDiscontinuationHemostasisPlatelet disorderThrombosisVon Willebrand diseaseImmune thrombocytopeniaGastroenterologyInternal medicineVenous thrombosisVon Willebrand factorImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter talks about diagnosis, management, treatment and prevention of quantitative platelet disorders as well as few case studies on this disorder. Thrombocytopenia, defined as a platelet count of less than 150 × 109/L, may be congenital or acquired. Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) occurs secondary to autoantibodies that accelerate platelet destruction and additionally impair megakaryo-cytopoiesis. Neonatal thrombocytopenia, one of the most common hematological abnormalities observed in the neonatal period, may be classified based on the timing of the thrombocytopenia. Immediate bleeding is typical of thrombocytopenia, similar to other disorders of primary hemostasis, including platelet function defects and von Willebrand disease (VWD). Recurrent thrombocytopenia on discontinuation, arterial and venous thrombosis, bone marrow reticulin deposition, and hepatotoxicity are known side-effects. The therapeutic goal is to attain a safe platelet count that prevents major bleeding and allows a patient to lead a relatively normal life, rather than correcting the platelet counts to normal levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→