Des héroïnes vertueuses :autour des représentations de la pièce Pamela (1793-1797)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Martin Nadeau, Virtuous Heroines : Representations of Pamela (1793-1797). Three manifestations of the figure of the virtuous heroine are represented in this play by Francois de Neufchateau, performed in Paris between 1793 and 1797. In addition to the fictional personage of Pamela, whose virtue triumphs over the misfortunes and manipulations of Milord Bonfil, and is rewarded at the time of the denouement of intrigue, other types of female characters, more tangible, are here presented. On one hand, the actrices in the title role played an active part outside the realm of theater, in the political sphere where Terror and virtue tried, in the year II, to unite. On the other hand, female spectators, actrices after a fashion, constituted the essential public of Pamela, just as they had made up the readership of Samuel Richardson, the inspiration for Neufchateau. These women, too, were active outside the theatrical world, agitating in favor of political tolerance. From then on and under the Directory, they turned this theatrical performance into a public platform of political debate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".