European-level Industrial and Class Relations in the Wake of the Eurozone Crisis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The European labour movement has suffered a great number of defeats since the Eurozone Crisis began in October, 2009.In the crisis response, the EU implemented policies that have consistently prioritized the needs of capital over those of the working class.This thesis uses a class-based analysis to contextualize industrial relations at the European level during the Eurozone crisis.It concludes that the outcome of the crisis was grounded in the thirty years that preceded the crisis, during which time neoliberalism was engrained into the formation of the EU.The neoliberal policy set provided capital with a significant structural advantage and tied organize labour to structure in which it was structurally disadvantaged.Fundamentally, the weakness of labour is grounded in its lack structural power at the European level.In order to correct this, labour will have to take steps to build solidarity that is grounded on a common European identity.1 Benchmarking working Europe.Brussels: ETUI-REHS, 2013.: 50 2 Heyes, Jason."Flexicurity in crisis: European labour market policies in a time of austerity."European
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".