MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4234734904 · doi:10.1101/2020.09.24.20200972

Cognitive impairment is differentially associated with depression and anxiety at six-months post-stroke

2020· preprint· en· W4234734904 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Owen A. Williams, Nele Demeyere

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyStroke (engine)Depression (economics)Montreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitionHospital Anxiety and Depression ScalePsychologyMedicineCognitive impairmentClinical psychologyInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective This study investigated the associations between general cognitive impairment and domain specific cognitive impairment with post-stroke depression and anxiety at six-months post-stroke. Methods Participants were a subset of 437 stroke patients from the OCS-CARE study who were followed up at a 6 months post-stroke assessment. Depression and anxiety symptoms were assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale sub-scales. General cognitive impairment was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and stroke-specific cognitive domain impairments was assessed using the Oxford Cognitive Screen. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the associations between cognition and depression/anxiety symptoms, controlling for acute stroke severity and ADL impairment, age, sex, education, and co-occurring post-stroke depression/anxiety. Results Six-month post-stroke depression was associated with six-month impairment on the MoCA (beta [ b ] =0.96, standard error [ SE ] =0.31, p =0.006), and all individual domains assessed by the OCS including spatial attention ( b =0.67, SE =0.33, p =0.041), executive function ( b =1.37, SE =0.47, p =0.004), language processing ( b =0.87, SE =0.38, p =0.028), memory ( b =0.76, SE =0.37, p =0.040), number processing ( b =1.13, SE =0.40, p =0.005), and praxis ( b =1.16, SE =0.49, p =0.028). Post-stroke anxiety was associated with impairment on the MoCA ( b =1.47, SE =0.42, p =0.001), and spatial attention ( b =1.25, SE =0.45, p =0.006), but these associations did not remain significant after controlling for co-occurring post-stroke depression. Conclusion The different profiles of associations between cognitive impairment and post-stroke depression and anxiety suggest that cognitive impairment is highly related to depressive symptomatology, but associations observed between cognitive impairment and anxiety may actually be the result of co-morbid post stroke depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→