MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234744634 · doi:10.1109/aspdac.2004.1337721

Automatic process migration of datapath hard IP libraries

2005· article· en· W4234744634 on OpenAlexaff
Fang Fang, Jianwen Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueASP-DAC 2004: Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference 2004 (IEEE Cat. No.04EX753) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDatapathComputer architectureComputer scienceProcess (computing)ReusabilityIntegrated circuit layoutIntegrated circuit designCircuit designEmbedded systemIntegrated circuitOperating systemSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While essential for high-performance circuit design, the custom nature of datapath components confines their use in only a few micropmessor companies. The reusability of datapath intellectual pmperty (IP) libraries is largely limited by their dependence on process technology. Layout migration tools today, which are based on layout compaction developed decades ago, cannot cope with the challenges involved. In this paper, we present B comprehensive datapath IP development framework that can perform process migration by accommodating advanced circuit considerations, layout architecture and transistor sizing, in addition to design mle satisfaction. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the framework by migrating the Berkeley low power library, originally developed for 1.2um MOSIS process, into TSMC 0.25μm and 0.18μm technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASP-DAC 2004: Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference 2004 (IEEE Cat. No.04EX753)Same topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207