MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234842738 · doi:10.1002/9781119483946.ch5

Discretization and Fixed‐Point Analysis

2018· other· en· W4234842738 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed M. Moghadas, Majid Jaberi‐Douraki

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods for differential equations
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscretizationFixed pointMathematicsContinuous modellingApplied mathematicsStability (learning theory)Discrete systemDiscretization of continuous featuresDomain (mathematical analysis)Fixed-point theoremPoint (geometry)System dynamicsEuler methodEuler's formulaComputer scienceMathematical analysisDiscretization errorAlgorithmGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The level of complexity in many mathematical models precludes the formulation of their explicit solutions. Therefore, understanding the qualitative dynamics of such models may require the study of their quantitative behavior. These models often depend on parameters that play crucial roles in system dynamics such as stability and bifurcation. To observe such dynamics, discretization and simulation tools are widely used to approximate the solutions of continuous models in the domain of their variables. The formulation of a discrete system depends on the method used for discretization of the continuous system. The chapter discusses two discretization schemes for deterministic models, including the Euler method, and a nonstandard finite-difference method. The fixed points of a system of difference equations should correspond to the critical points of the underlying continuous system. The fixed-point theorem is applied to analyze the behavior of a discrete system around its fixed points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical ModellingSame topicNumerical methods for differential equationsFrench-language works237,207