MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4234859402 · doi:10.24124/2015/bpgub1032

From God to mammon: The metamorphosis of civil religion in Canada.

2015· dissertation· en· W4234859402 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Clarence Gerald Hofsink

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPietyFaithDemocracyCivil societyPluralism (philosophy)Political scienceCivil religionHistory of religionsSociologyLawEnvironmental ethicsReligious studiesPoliticsTheologyPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis explores civil religion in Canada. It examines the work of Rousseau, Durkheim, and the reintroduction of the concept of civil religion by Robert Bellah in 1967. Although some scholars argue that Canada does not possess a civil religion, this thesis asserts that a civil religion has been well manifested in Canadian society. Since Confederation, Canada has seen the rise and fall of Christian civic piety, something that once permeated public life in Canada. The thesis studies the metamorphosis of civil religion and its impact on public policy in education. It examines legal challenges concerning religion in the field of education as exemplars to examine this metamorphosis. This thesis concludes that education policy and court decisions reflect a new-found belief in democratic faith, which has replace Christian civic piety as Canada's civic religion. The conclusion raises questions about the capacity of this democratic faith to embrace religious pluralism. --Leaf ii.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0320.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics→French-language works237,207→