MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234904953 · doi:10.1002/9781118430873.est0593

Communication Theory

2017· other· en· W4234904953 on OpenAlexaff
Steve Bailey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Communication, and Education
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommunication theoryMedia ecologyFocus (optics)Mass communicationRhetorical questionSociologyPublic sphereCommoditySocial mediaGermanPoliticsCommunication studiesMedia theoryMedia system dependency theorySocial theoryNew mediaMedia studiesPublic relationsMedia relationsSocial sciencePolitical scienceCommunicationComputer scienceGeographyArtWorld Wide WebLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Communication and media theory refers to a wide range of perspectives used to examine forms and processes of human communication. While having some ancient origins, communication and media theory emerges as a major branch of social theory in the mid‐twentieth century. The major theoretical schools of thought explored in this entry are: the propaganda, public sphere, and audience commodity models that focus on larger systemic and political economic frameworks; the media ecology, ritual communication, and German media theory approaches that focus on technology; rhetorical and textual interpretive theories emphasizing the analysis of specific messages; and audience‐based theoretical approaches, including the Birmingham School “active audience” model that stresses the practices of media consumers, as well as recent theories of convergence culture that focus on the increasing merging of previously separate elements of communication and media culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.011
Scholarly communication0.0110.009
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social TheorySame topicMedia, Communication, and EducationFrench-language works237,207