MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234904968 · doi:10.2523/131805-ms

Mesoscopic Simulation of Rheology of Polymer Solution

2010· article· en· W4234904968 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaobo Li, Jié Song, Jiangru Yuan, Yang Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionChinaBeijingCitationMesoscopic physicsComputer scienceLibrary sciencePolitical scienceArt historyPhysicsArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mesoscopic Simulation of Rheology of Polymer Solution Xiaobo Li; Xiaobo Li PetroChina RIPED Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Jie Song; Jie Song PetroChina RIPED Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Jiangru Yuan; Jiangru Yuan PetroChina RIPED Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Yang Dai Yang Dai PetroChina Company Limited Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, China, June 2010. Paper Number: SPE-131805-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/131805-MS Published: June 08 2010 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Li, Xiaobo , Song, Jie , Yuan, Jiangru , and Yang Dai. "Mesoscopic Simulation of Rheology of Polymer Solution." Paper presented at the International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, China, June 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/131805-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China Search Advanced Search Abstract The need for high performance polymers used in chemical EOR is increasing in some oil fields, especially in China. It is a challenging issue to simulation the flow of polymer solution through pores. What make the complexity of this problem are the multiple physical phenomenons that the transformations of macromolecule interact with the macroscopic flow. Both molecular and hydrodynamic effects are of important at this scale, but not all of which can be resolved by the traditional continuum-based approaches that involves solution of the Navier-Stokes equations with a phenomenological constitutive equation. Microscopic molecular dynamics, on the other hand, requires excessive calculation time before macroscopic effects become visible, and therefore dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) is used to simulate the rheological properties of polymer solution in our work. As a particle-based mesoscopic method, the DPD method is appropriate to study complex fluids including polymer or surfactant [1]. In this study, the polymer molecule was represented with a chain of beads connected with finite extensible nonlinear elastic (FENE) springs that led to viscoelastic flow, and the periodic Poiseuille flow method proposed by Backer et al [2] was applied to measure the viscosity of simulation system. The rheological properties of linear, branch- and star- polymers solution were simulated, and some factors including molecular weight, molecular topology and concentration were evaluated quantitatively. Besides that, the radius of gyration of polymers was recorded in simulations. In our opinion, the numerical instabilities of many conventional methods can be avoided in this approach, and the simulation results gave a clear physical insight into the flow of polymer solution. Keywords: simulation, polymer solution, society of petroleum engineers, upstream oil & gas, spe 131805, dissipative particle dynamic, rheology, rheological property, simulation result, enhanced recovery Subjects: Improved and Enhanced Recovery, Chemical flooding methods Copyright 2010, Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in ChinaSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207