MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234933877 · doi:10.1515/kern-2002-0078

The role of PLiM technologies in CANDU <sup>TM</sup> ongoing aging management, life extension, and new designs

2002· article· en· W4234933877 on OpenAlexaff
Basma A. Shalaby, James H. Nickerson, R. F. Dam, N. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueKerntechnik · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSystems engineeringService (business)Computer scienceService lifeRisk analysis (engineering)Reliability engineeringEngineeringBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper will discuss AECL’s approach in providing a comprehensive “full knowledge” support to plant ageing and ageing management. This requires the integration of research and development into safety, design, and service areas of the company. The paper will also explore how this integration is being accomplished through the initiatives of the PLiM program. The paper will examine several examples of how AECL is developing its understanding of ageing degradation, the engineered solutions, applying those solutions, improving those solutions, and finally incorporating these solutions into both the PLiM program and into new designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKerntechnikSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207