MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4234962342 · doi:10.4000/ifha.8204

Michaela Puzicha, Kommentar zur Vita Benedicti. Gregor der Groβe : Das zweite Buch der Dialoge – Leben und Wunder des ehrwürdigen Abtes Benedikt

2014· article· de· W4234962342 on OpenAlexaff
Klaus Krönert

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2014
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autant la Règle de saint Benoît a attiré l’attention des chercheurs, autant la Vita Benedicti, rédigée par Grégoire le Grand, a été jusqu’ici négligée par les historiens. Ce constat a amené Michaela Puzicha (OSB), docteur en théologie, directrice de l’« Institut pour des études bénédictines » à Salzbourg et auteur d’un livre sur la Règle de saint Benoît (2002), à rédiger un commentaire sur cette Vie. Celle-ci fait partie des « quatre livres de Dialogues », dans lesquels le pape présente diffé...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicByzantine Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207