La complejidad del régimen internacional y la gobernanza regional: evidencia de Latinoamérica
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La proliferación de acuerdos de cooperación que se superponen (overlapping) y de organizaciones, y la densidad en los regímenes internacionales que de ahí resulta, conducen a la discusión sobre las consecuencias de la creciente complejidad de régimen sobre la política y la efectividad de la gobernanza global. Este artículo analiza si la superposición y la interacción entre varias instituciones en el área de un solo tema afectan la complejidad de los regímenes o las metas de la cooperación internacional. Se discute evidencia empírica sobre la presencia y relevancia de algunos de estos mecanismos en Latinoamérica. Se observa que la dinámica competitiva entre Estados y regímenes con visiones y objetivos divergentes quebranta la cohesión y la solidaridad regionales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it