Rétroactivité permise en matière de sentences dans les services publics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les jugements sont déclaratoires de droit. Le différend soumis à un Conseil d'arbitrage demeure ce qu'il était à l'origine. C'est donc le litige originairement soumis qui est décidé par la sentence arbitrale, ce qui implique rétroactivité. Il répugne à l'idée de justice que des employés soient privés des avantages qui leur sont postérieurement reconnus tout simplement parce que toutes les procédures de l'arbitrage n'ont pu être accomplies simultanément le même jour. L'Hôpital St-Ambroise de Loretteville et l'Association des employés de l'Hôpital de St-Ambroise de Loretteville; Hon. Paul Lesage, J.C.S., président; Marcel Bélanger, ca., arbitre patronal; Jacques Archambault, arbitre syndical; Ministère du Travail, Province de Québec, Bulletin No 1614, le 10 août 1961. Me Paul Lebel, c.r., procureur de la partie patronale, Me Magella Lemay, procureur de la partie syndicale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.046 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".