Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Technology and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of West AtticaNational Technical University of AthensNational Institute of InformaticsUniversité Paris 13Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de LyonUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingUniversidad Carlos III de MadridUniversità degli Studi dell'AquilaDonghua UniversityXidian UniversityNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaBeijing Jiaotong UniversitySouth China University of TechnologyUniversité de Bretagne OccidentaleTsinghua UniversityHeriot-Watt UniversityJinan UniversitySouthwest Jiaotong UniversityKoç ÜniversitesiUniversidade de CoimbraQueen's UniversityKing's College LondonDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtIstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiChalmers Tekniska HögskolaSyracuse UniversityBeijing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsSun Yat-sen UniversityUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeHanyang UniversitySoutheast UniversityIndian Institute of Technology, PatnaUlster UniversityUniversity of the West of ScotlandScuola Superiore Sant'AnnaKing Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsAmirkabir University of TechnologyIndian Institute of Technology KanpurLoughborough UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversitat Pompeu FabraYork UniversityNorthumbria UniversityUniversity of OttawaTrường Đại học Bách Khoa Hà NộiKing Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyNanjing UniversityPohang University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of South AlabamaUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaSoongsil UniversityNational University of SingaporeUniversità di BolognaUniversità degli Studi di Napoli ParthenopeDeakin UniversityUniversity of MacedoniaZTE CorporationIndian Institute of Technology IndoreSanta Clara UniversityChinese University of Hong KongUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IIUniversidade Nova de LisboaVillanova UniversityQatar UniversityIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNanjing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsUniversity of Ontario Institute of TechnologyQueen Mary University of LondonUniversidad de CantabriaTrường Đại học Duy TânIndian National Science AcademyWestern Michigan UniversityNational Sun Yat-sen University
KeywordsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsComputer networkComputer security
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexIEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS is aimed at satisfying the need for rapid dissemination of information, offering a vehicle for authors to expose their results to be used in future developments. This ensures early recognition of work. The objective is to establish a highly authoritative outlet for new results in communications world wide, presenting archival material and bestowing prestige on the authors as a result of IEEE Communications Society's high standards for publication. Emphasis is on the use of advanced communication tools such as fax machines, electronic mail, and other electronic media (including the possibility of printing directly from electronic copy). The anticipated time of three months from submission to publication would depend on the method of communication of information, in association with relatively straightforward, though stringent, review procedures; requiring referee responses within four weeks. For membership and subscription information and pricing, please visit
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score0.998
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
