MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235155637 · doi:10.5558/tfc77002-1

BREAKING THROUGH TO THE POPULAR CULTURE

2001· article· en· W4235155637 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
V Nordin, J.-C Ruel, Steen Magnussen, Hogan, L Couto, F Bunnell, I Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Forestry Chronicle · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Studies and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopular cultureSociologyMedia studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is s stematically scanned for inclusion in Foreshy Abstracts and,& Forest Product Abstracts. Un taux de $100.00 la page est requis pour tout article. Le "Forestry Chronicle" est inclu dans la liste des ouvrages indexes et resumes par le service d'information en Sciences biologiques des "Biological Abshacts" ainsi que celle de la "Environmental Periodicals Bibliography". . . . Subsaiption rates per year in Canada $%.30 single subsaimon $107.00 libraries and multi-user. All other countries $100.00

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0120.015
Scholarly communication0.0220.017
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0910.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Forestry ChronicleSame topicBotanical Studies and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207