MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A phase I pilot study of preoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Long-term toxicity and oncologic outcomes.

2019· article· en· W4235183483 on OpenAlexaff
Noelia Sanmamed, Rachel Glicksman, John Thoms, Alexandre R. Zlotta, Antonio Finelli, Theodorus van der Kwast, Joan Sweet, Michael Jewett, Laurence Klotz, Tara Rosewall, Neil Fleshner, Robert G. Bristow, Padraig Warde, Alejandro Berlín

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkMemorial University of NewfoundlandPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse EventsProstatectomyToxicityGenitourinary systemRadiation therapyProstateSurgeryUrologyCancerAdverse effectInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

60 Background: Pre-operative radiotherapy (PreORT) improves local control in various cancer types, and has become an established oncologic treatment strategy. During 2001-2004, we conducted a phase I pilot study assessing the role of short-course PreORT for men with unfavourable intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa). We present long-term follow-up toxicity and oncologic outcomes. Methods: Eligible patients had histologically proven PCa, cT1-T2N0M0, PSA > 15-35 ng/ml with any Gleason score, or PSA 10-15 ng/ml with Gleason score ≥7. Patients received 25 Gy in five consecutive daily fractions to the prostate, followed by radical prostatectomy (RadP) within 14 days after RT completion. Primary outcomes were intra-operative morbidity, and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities. Acute toxicity was assessed during radiotherapy treatment on daily basis using RTOG grade scoring scale. Patients were assessed post-RadP clinically and with PSA at 1 and 6 months, and every 6 months. Intra- and Post-RadP toxicity was documented prospectively and scored as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. Biochemical failure (BF) was determined based on two consecutive post-RadP PSA > 0.2 ng/ml. Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled; 14 patients completed PreORT followed by RadP, which also included bilateral lymph node dissections in 13 cases. Median follow-up was 12.2 years (range 6.7-16.3 years). Late GU toxicity was common, with 2 patients (14.3%) experiencing G2 toxicity, and 6 patients (42.8%) G3 toxicity. There were no G4-5 late GU toxicity. Late GI toxicity was infrequent, with only 1 patient (7.1%) experiencing transient G2 proctitis. At last follow-up, 8 (57.1%) and 6 (42.8%) patients experienced BF and metastatic disease recurrence, respectively. Conclusions: The use of PreORT in men with high-risk PCa is associated with unexpected high-rates of late GU toxicity. Future studies examining the role of RT pre-RadP must cautiously select RT technique and dose schedule. Importantly, long-term follow-up data is essential to fully determine the therapeutic index of PreORT in the management of localized PCa. Clinical trial information: NCT00252447.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.214
GPT teacher head0.562
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→