MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235247222 · doi:10.24124/2008/bpgub1357

Factors that predict employee retention in traditional pulp and paper mills facing labour shortages using a statistical model

2008· dissertation· en· W4235247222 on OpenAlexaff
Tyrone Robert McWhannel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttritionMillEconomic shortageOperations managementEngineeringPulp millJob satisfactionPulp (tooth)BusinessMarketingManagementEconomicsWaste managementMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This empirical study examines factors which affect employee attrition in the British Columbia pulp and paper mill industry. Although no new pulp mills have been built in BC for decades, they are complex technical facilities that require a highly skilled work force. In the past ten years, 50% of those jobs have been lost in BC. New workers are less likely to consider joining an industry that is perceived to be in decline. In fact, pulp mills are experiencing high turnover and finding recruitment of skilled labour to be difficult. ... A survey was conducted using core questions based on existing job satisfaction research. The survey results provide rankings and correlations of employee intention to remain factors within a British Columbia pulp mill.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyFrench-language works237,207