Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
House of Fashion: Haute Couture and the Modern Interior, Jess Berry (2018) London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 213 pp., black and white illustrations and colour plates, bibliography, index, ISBN 978-1-47428-340-3, p/bk, $31.95 The Fashion Show: History, Theory and Practice, Gill Stark (2018) 1st ed., London, New Delhi, New York and Sydney: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 216 pp., ISBN 978-1-47256-848-9, p/bk, $27.96 Fashioning Horror: Dressing to Kill On Screen and in Literature, Julia Petrov and Gudrun D. Whitehead (eds) (2018) London: Bloomsbury Academic, 234 pp., ISBN 978-1-35003-618-5, h/bk, £85, $114 Fashion Cities Africa, Hannah Azieb Pool (ed.) (2016) Bristol and Chicago: Intellect, 143 pp., ISBN 978-1-78320-611-7, p/bk, $28.50 Fashion Journalism: History, Theory and Practice, Sanda Miller and Peter McNeil (2018) New York: Bloomsbury, 172 pp., ISBN 978-1-47253-581-8, p/bk, $28.76; ISBN 978-1-47252-017-3, h/bk, $84.60 Colors in Fashion, Jonathan Faiers and Mary Westerman Bulgarella (eds) (2017) London: Bloomsbury, 227 pp., ISBN 978-1-35007-740-9, p/bk, $37.95 Fashioning Professionals: Identity and Representation at Work in the Creative Industries, Leah Armstrong and Felice MCDOWELL (EDS) (2018) London, Oxford, New York, New Delhi and Sydney: Bloomsbury, 224 pp., ISBN 978-1-35000-186-2, h/bk, $88.00 Fashion History: A Global View, Linda Welters and Abby Lillethun (2018) London and New York: Bloomsbury, 195 pp., ISBN 978-1-47425-476-2, p/bk, $91.00 Fashioning the Victorians: A Critical Sourcebook, Rebecca N. Mitchell (ed.) (2018) London, New York, Oxford, New Delhi and Sydney: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 245 pp., ISBN 978-1-35002-339-0, h/bk; ISBN 978-1-35002-340-6, p/bk; ISBN 978-1-35002-338-3, ePub; ISBN 978-3-50023-413, e-book, $94.00
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".