MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235275354 · doi:10.1016/s0887-6177(98)00157-7

Distinct Neurocognitive Profiles in Multiple Sclerosis Subtypes

2000· article· en· W4235275354 on OpenAlexaff
Konstantine K. Zakzanis

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurocognitiveNeuropsychologyMultiple sclerosisPsychologyCognitive impairmentClinical psychologyCognitionNeuropsychological assessmentMedicineAudiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An effect size analysis was used to review the neuropsychological literature of multiple sclerosis (MS) to determine whether reliable neurocognitive test deficits and differences between chronic-progressive and relapse-remitting subtypes are apparent. Studies dating back to 1983 were gathered and the neuropsychological test results from a total of 1,845 patients with MS, and 1,265 healthy controls, were synthesized using meta-analytic principles. The results indicate that neurocognitive impairment is indeed evident in patients with MS on a number of cognitive tasks and test variables. Secondly, distinct patterns of neurocognitive deficits are evident in chronic-progressive and relapse-remitting subtypes of MS. Finally, relations between neurocognitive impairment and clinical and demographic attributes of patients with MS were revealed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.013
Bibliometrics0.0070.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Clinical NeuropsychologySame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207