Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2011), "List of Contributors", Libecap, G.D. and Hoskinson, S. (Ed.) Entrepreneurship and Global Competitiveness in Regional Economies: Determinants and Policy Implications (Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth, Vol. 22), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. vii-viii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1048-4736(2011)0000022002 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters Entrepreneurship and Global Competitiveness in Regional Economies: Determinants and Policy Implications Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth Copyright Page List of Contributors Introduction: Entrepreneurship and Global Competitiveness in Regional Economies: Determinants and Policy Implications Chapter 1 Globalization and Directed Technological Change at the Firm Level: The European Evidence Chapter 2 Globalization and Innovation in Advanced Economies Chapter 3 A Series of Unfortunate Events: The Growth, Decline, and Rebirth of Ottawa's Entrepreneurial Institutions Chapter 4 Entrepreneurship and Growth: What Causes What? Chapter 5 The New “Cluster Moment”: How Regional Innovation Clusters can Foster the Next Economy Chapter 6 Wichita's Aircraft Manufacturing Cluster, Knowledge Spillovers, and the Emergence of a Medical Device Manufacturing Cluster Chapter 7 The Role of Labor Market Institutions on Entrepreneurship Dynamics in Times of Crisis: Evidence from European Countries Chapter 8 Knowledge Structure and Regional Economic Growth: The French Case Chapter 9 An Innovative Vision for Economic Development in Higher Education: An Essay on Balancing Community Growth and Global Competitiveness
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".