MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235344571 · doi:10.1049/pbpc033e_ch8

Human-in-the-loop models for multi-access edge computing

2020· book-chapter· en· W4235344571 on OpenAlexaff
Amin Ebrahimzadeh, Martin Maier

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitution of Engineering and Technology eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueInstitut National d'Optique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoop (graph theory)Human-in-the-loopComputer scienceEdge computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDistributed computingHuman–computer interactionTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this chapter, studied the role of HITL-centric networks based on the concept of MEC-enabled FiWi-enhanced LTE-A HetNets in realizing the Tactile Internet's <10 -ms delay challenge, thereby paying particular attention to coexistent local/nonlocal teleoperation and inquiring into the specific characteristics of haptic traces at the packet level. The Tactile Internet traffic analysis reveals that the teleoperation command and feedback paths can be jointly modeled by the GP, gamma, or deterministic packet inter-arrival time distribution, depending on the value of DC parameter d. DC was shown to be particularly effective in the command path. Alternatively, in the feedback path, the proposed AI-based sample forecasting module embedded in MEC servers is instrumental in achieving a very high haptic sample forecasting accuracy with an MSE of zero in case of local teleoperation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitution of Engineering and Technology eBooksSame topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207