MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235352239 · doi:10.1080/23802359.2019.1689859

The complete mitochondrial genome and phylogenetic analysis of <i>Cancer pagurus</i> (Decapoda, Cancridae)

2019· article· en· W4235352239 on OpenAlexaff
Sigang Fan, Chao Zhao, Pengfei Wang, Lulu Yan, Lihua Qiu

Bibliographic record

VenueMitochondrial DNA Part B · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMitochondrial DNABiologyGenomePhylogenetic treeGeneGeneticsTransfer RNARibosomal RNAHeavy strandRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complete mitochondrial genome of Cancer pagurus was obtained using next-generation sequencing. The circular genome was 42,736 bp in length, consisting of 13 protein-coding genes, 26 transfer RNA genes, and 2 ribosomal RNA genes. The control region was not found in mitochondrial genome. Of the 41 genes, 21 were encoded by the heavy strand, while the others were encoded by the light strand. The genome composition with A + T bias (74.10%). The phylogenetic analysis suggested that C. pagurus was closest to Austinograea alayseae. The newly described mitochondrial genome may provide valuable data for phylogenetic analysis for Cancridae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMitochondrial DNA Part BSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207