MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235354957 · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e3181f69252

Anesthesia Literature Review

2010· article· en· W4235354957 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Timothy J. Brennan

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

J. Lance Lichtor, M.D., and Joseph F. Antognini, M.D., Editors Measures developed by the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) have been adopted by many institutions in an attempt to decrease surgical infections and complication rates. However, reports from individual institutions have shown mixed results on the effectiveness of these measures.To evaluate the association between six infection-prevention SCIP measures and postoperative infection rates, the authors performed a retrospective study of data from 398 hospitals in the Premier Inc. Perspective Database, which included discharges between July 1, 2006, and March 31, 2008. Individual SCIP measures assessed included prophylactic antibiotic use within 1 h before surgical incision or discontinued within 24 h after surgery end time; cardiac surgery patients with controlled 6 am postoperative blood glucose; surgery patients with appropriate hair removal; and colorectal surgery patients with immediate postoperative normothermia.Of 405,720 patient records reviewed, 62.4% were women, 68.7% were white, and 45.7% were Medicare patients. Most patients (67.8%) had undergone elective surgeries, and these were conducted at mostly urban (81.0%), nonteaching (68.3%) hospitals. There were 3,996 cases of postoperative infection documented and these patients were more likely to be older, have at least one comorbidity, and have been admitted emergently (predictive value: P < 0.001). Furthermore, documented infections were significantly associated with hospital characteristics and occurred most often in large, urban teaching hospitals in the Northeast. Overall, adherence rates increased over the 2-yr period. However, the reported adherence on individual SCIP measures or the composite measure for prophylactic antibiotic use was not associated with a decreased risk of infection. In fact, postoperative infection rate actually increased during the 2-yr period.For anesthesiologists, intraoperative documentation of antibiotic use is now the norm. Adherence to individual SCIP measures was not associated with decreased infection. Despite the large effort directed toward SCIP, adherence has improved but surgical infection outcomes have not.An efficient handover of patient care is critical for quality of care and patient outcomes. Handover failures account for 20% of malpractice claims in the United States, and a recent study of surgical patients described that 67% of anesthesia providers failed to transfer all essential information.A qualitative, semistructured, interview-based, two-phase study was conducted to identify the information transfer and communication problems in postoperative handover and to develop and validate a novel protocol for standardizing this communication. In the collection phase, surgeons (n = 7), anesthesia providers (n = 5), and nurses (n = 6) of various levels of experience were interviewed by a researcher with a background in surgery and patient safety. Multiple blind coders were used to ensure triangulation and reliability of the coding process. In the validation phase, a Delphi method was used to elicit consensus from a group of 50 surgical professionals.Interviews revealed that incomplete handovers occurred because the process was informal, unstructured, and inconsistent. Nearly all participants felt that the surgeon and anesthesia provider should be present during the handover, and most believed the theater nurse should also be present. A 28-question checklist was then identified and validated. Of these, 21 items had a mean importance score greater than 4.0 and were included in the postoperative handover proforma under the following headings: patient-specific information, surgical information, and anesthetic information.Communication among members of the healthcare team is critical to improving care of patients. Handover of care of postsurgical patients is often informal and unstructured; improving communication by, among other things, having a handover protocol, might lessen errors. More research is needed to determine whether this approach would minimize errors related to handover of anesthetic care from one anesthesiologist to another.Elderly patients receive nearly half of all blood transfusions. However, there are limited large clinical trial data to support the current hematocrit trigger at which intraoperative blood transfusions are needed in the general population and in the elderly.This retrospective study of data from the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database examined the effect of intraoperative blood transfusion on 30-day mortality in older patients who underwent major noncardiac surgery. Data from patients older than 65 years of age, with a hematocrit less than 0.54, who underwent one noncardiac procedure between 1997 and 2004, were included.Of 239,286 patients, 9.4% received at least 1 unit of erythrocytes during surgery. Most patients (98%) were men, with an average age of 73 yr. Patients who received transfusions were more likely to have a lower preoperative hematocrit, were less likely to be white, and had a higher prevalence of comorbidities (e.g ., severe systemic disease, cardiac disease, neurologic or pulmonary disorders, or hematologic problems). Patients received an average of 2.6 units of erythrocytes intraoperatively. The overall mortality rates did not differ between groups (10.2 vs . 16.7% for the transfused and controls, respectively). Patients who received transfusions had a higher risk for 30-day mortality compared with propensity-matched controls, although when controlled for risk factors, transfusion benefitted some patients.Trigger thresholds for transfusion remain controversial. Not unexpectedly, older patients who had low preoperative hematocrits (less than 24%), significant blood loss (more than 500 ml), or both had lower mortality when transfused. However, patients with preoperative hematocrits more than 0.30 and blood loss less than 500 ml who were transfused had increased mortality, suggesting that transfusion in such cases may be harmful.Despite their beneficial effects, the use of gastric acid suppressants increases the risk of aspiration pneumonia because of bacterial overgrowth in the stomach and esophagus. However, no large clinical study has directly compared the rates of postoperative pneumonia in patients who did or did not receive gastric acid suppressants.To test whether gastric acid suppressants are associated with an increased risk of postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing elective surgery, a population-wide retrospective cohort analysis study of data from the Canadian Institutes for Health Information databases was conducted. Data from consecutive older patients (older than 65 yr) admitted to acute care hospitals for elective surgeries over a 16-yr period were analyzed.Of 593,265 patients included, most were admitted for abdominal (26%) or musculoskeletal (22.7%) surgeries. Twenty-one percent of patients were taking an acid suppressant before surgery; of those, the most common drugs were omeprazole (21%) and ranitidine (37%). The frequency of postoperative pneumonia was approximately 30% higher in patients who received acid suppressants before surgery compared with those who did not. However, no increase in risk was observed after adjustment for multiple factors, including drug class, drug dose, duration, or type of surgery.Postoperative pneumonia is a serious complication after elective surgery, particularly in elderly patients. This study retrospectively compared rates of postoperative pneumonia in elderly patients undergoing elective inpatient surgery who did or did not receive long-term gastric acid suppressant therapy and who did not find an increased risk of postoperative pneumonia. However, as the accompanying editorial points out, there are conflicting results from multiple studies, which are mostly retrospective. Therefore, prospective studies are needed to clearly analyze this potential problem.As the aging population expands, more patients who are older are undergoing surgeries. These patients may be at an increased risk for postoperative complications, which can lead to multiple events, including mortality, loss of independence, and reduced quality of life. However, preoperative risk assessment and measurements of physiologic reserves are not standardized for older patients.A prospective study was conducted to test the hypothesis that frailty predicts operative risk in older surgical patients and that it enhances current risk models. Patients 65 years of age or older presenting for a preoperative assessment underwent a standardized preoperative interview, and frailty was assessed based on a validated scoring system (i.e ., weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, low physical activity, and slowed walking speed). Patients scoring 4–5 were classified as frail, those scoring 2–3 were intermediately frail, and those scoring 0–1 were nonfrail.Of 594 patients enrolled, 10.4% were frail, 31.3% were intermediately frail, and 58.3% were nonfrail. The majority of patients in all groups were white (82.8–83.9%) and the frail patients were generally older (mean age: 76.3 yr [frail], 74.5 yr [intermediate], and 71.3 yr [nonfrail]). Frailty was an independent predictor of surgical complications (odds ratio [OR = 2.54]), increased length of stay (OR = 1.69), and odds of being discharged to a skilled or assisted-living facility (OR = 20.48).Frailty has been shown to be associated with poor outcome in hospitalized patients but not in perioperative patients. The authors found that frailty was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, length of stay, and discharge to an assisted or skilled nursing facility. Longer-term and multicenter studies are recommended.The number of ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) has increased by 50%, and procedures being performed at ASCs have increased to more than 6 million. However, recent outbreaks of health care–associated infections and associated lapses in infection control have called into question the quality of care at ASCs.To observe compliance with basic infection control practices and Medicare health and safety standards in ASCs, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services piloted an infection control audit tool in a sample of ASC inspections. After notification of the State Survey Agencies, seven states volunteered for participation and three were selected based on geographic dispersion, number of ASCs each state committed to inspect, and relative cost per inspection. Assessments focused on five areas of infection control: Hand hygiene, injection safety and medication handling, equipment reprocessing, environmental cleaning, and handling of blood glucose monitoring equipment.ASCs from Maryland (n = 32), North Carolina (n = 16), and Oklahoma (n = 16) were included, which reflected 9.4%, 21.1%, and 39.2% of all Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services–certified ACSs in each state, respectively. The majority of ASCs had at least one lapse in infection control (67.6%), and 17.6% had lapses in three or more of the five categories. Lapses included problems in handling of blood glucose monitoring equipment (46.3%), failure to adhere to equipment reprocessing practices (28.4%), and using single-dose medications for more than one patient (28.1%). There was no significant association between the number of procedures performed or type of facility and a lapse in infection control for any factor assessed.Infection outbreaks have recently been reported in ASCs. In this study, the authors analyzed unannounced assessments of randomly selected ASCs in Maryland, North Carolina, and Oklahoma. Lapses in hand hygiene, use of personal protective equipment, injection safety, medication handling, and equipment reprocessing were noted.Jean Mantz, M.D., Ph.D., Editor The majority of patients who survive critical illness with mechanical ventilation develop significant cognitive impairment. However, the specific risk factors and predictors associated with the development of cognitive impairment in these patients are not well understood.This prospective cohort study (part of the Awakening and Breathing Controlled Randomized Trial) evaluated cognitive changes in patients for up to 1 yr after admittance to a medical intensive care unit with mechanical ventilation for at least 12 h.Of 126 enrolled patients, only 77 (78%) were included in the analysis because of death, loss to follow up, or withdrawal. The median age was 61 yr; most were admitted for severe sepsis/acute respiratory distress syndrome (51%) or myocardial infarction/congestive heart failure (20%). Eighty-four percent experienced delirium in the intensive care unit. Overall, 71% of survivors had cognitive impairment at 1 yr. Duration of delirium was an independent predictor of worse cognitive performance but duration of mechanical ventilation was not.This study establishes a strong link between acute cognitive dysfunction (delirium) emerging during a critical illness and chronic cognitive dysfunction lasting for several months or more after discharge from the intensive care unit. Whether all types of delirium, including those with a cause clearly identified and corrected (i.e ., metabolic, septic, drug toxicity, or withdrawal syndrome) and those with indeterminate etiology, share the same prognostic value is not known. Whether interventions to decrease delirium could reduce the incidence of chronic cognitive dysfunction remains to be determined.Suggested by: Bernard de Jonghe, M.D. Systemic corticosteroids have been shown to be beneficial to the more than 6% of U.S. adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including improved lung function, reduced risk of treatment failure, and decreased length of hospital stay. However, the optimal route of administration and dose of corticosteroids have not yet been clearly defined.A multicenter, pharmacoepidemiologic, retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the outcomes of patients treated with low-dose oral steroids with those who received high-dose intravenous steroids. Data from patients admitted with a diagnosis of COPD in a non–intensive care setting, over a 1-yr period, from 414 hospitals in the Premier Inc. Perspective database, were collected. Treatment failure was defined as a composite measure of the initiation of mechanical ventilation after the second hospital day, inpatient mortality, or readmission for acute exacerbation of COPD within 30 days of discharge.The median age of patients (n = 79,985) was 69 yr, most were women (61%), and hypertension was a common comorbidity (60%). Most patients (92%) received high-dose intravenous steroids. Patients who did receive low-dose oral steroids were less likely to be white or have private insurance and had a greater number of comorbidities. Overall, 1.4 and 1.0% of patients in the IV and oral groups died during hospitalization. The proportion of patients who experienced the composite endpoint was also similar (10.9 and 10.3%, respectively). Statistical analyses demonstrated a lack of correlation between steroid dose and the risk of treatment failure in these analyses.This large study was performed in non–intensive care unit–hospitalized patients with exacerbation of COPD. Low doses of corticosteroids administered orally were not associated with worse outcome than high doses administered intravenously. This study may be useful to reduce the risks associated with high-dose intravenous corticosteroid therapy. However, a prospective clinical trial is warranted to confirm these findings.The primary tool for predicting prognosis after cardiac arrest, clinical neurologic examination, does not include modern reference data. A retrospective chart review of consecutive patients was conducted to assess the association between survival and the presence of traditional neurologic measures, including pupil response, corneal reflex, and motor response in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Furthermore, this study assessed the effects of therapeutic hypothermia on these measures.Neurologic examination findings at arrival and 24 and 72 h after cardiac arrest using the Glasgow Coma Score (motor examination, pupil response, and corneal response) from 272 patient charts over a 4-yr period were reviewed.The mean age of patients was 61 yr and most (57%) were men who had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (62%). A majority were treated with therapeutic hypothermia (59%). Overall, 33% of patients survived and 20% experienced a good outcome. A Glasgow Coma Score less than 3 at 24 or 72 h after cardiac arrest does not exclude survival to hospital discharge and good outcome. Hypothermia did not influence the association between good outcome and examination findings.This retrospective study emphasizes the prognostic role of clinical examination 24 and 72 h after cardiac arrest occurring out of hospital or in hospital. These findings suggest that clinical examination has value when generating a prognostic score in the context of cardiac arrest.Hemorrhage is a common cause of in-hospital death after trauma and can also contribute to deaths from multiorgan failure. Tranexamic acid, a synthetic agent, inhibits fibrinolysis and may therefore reduce blood loss in patients with exaggerated hemostatic response to severe vascular injury. A systematic review supported the use of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing elective surgery; however, its effects in trauma patients are not known.The Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Hemorrhage 2 trial was a multicenter placebo-controlled trial of adult trauma patients with significant hemorrhage or who were considered to be at significant risk within 8 h of injury. Patients were given either tranexamic acid (n = 10,093; loading dose 1 g over 10 min, then infusion of 1 g over 8 h) or placebo (n = 10,114).The majority of patients were men (84%) with a mean age of 34 yr, most of whom had experienced a blunt trauma (68%). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the tranexamic-acid group compared with the placebo group (14.5 vs . 16.0%; P = 0.035). Bleeding-related deaths were also significantly reduced in the tranexamic group (4.9 vs . 5.7%; P = 0.0077). Deaths due to multiorgan failure, head injury, or vascular occlusion did not differ between the two groups.This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial demonstrates that tranexamic acid decreases mortality at 28 days in trauma patients with significant hemorrhage. On the basis of these findings, the use of tranexamic within 8 h of injury in trauma patients with hemorrhage should be considered.Timothy J. Brennan, Ph.D., M.D., Editor Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common complication of herpes zoster (HZ), and the risk increases with increasing disease severity. However, the relationships between PHN and nerve injury and sensory disturbances after the onset of are not well These two on results from a study of the of including sensory and conducted to more the between patients who experience acute and from this cohort study, patients with at increased risk for PHN were for 6 months after onset of patients were in and had or study occurred within after at at 3 and at 6 These two on sensory and within the cohort and a of patients who to (n = the study of patients who had PHN at 6 months an of compared with only of patients with no at 6 There was only a of PHN patients with at 6 months compared with a in the The areas of were also and more in the PHN PHN patients also had more sensory to at study compared with the patients. In the study, nerve measurements were significantly lower in compared with control and lower for up to 6 and PHN are severe acute and respectively. with the development of PHN in patients with acute is a long-term In these studies, the authors nerve loss associated with to before was also not a for of The studies suggest that the of nerve injury and nerve and is not related to low is the second most common of patients in primary may contribute to chronic however, the and therefore potential remain a has been used in patients with multiple but the results have been authors conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial more data on the effect of in patients with chronic least 6 and Patients (n = years of age or older received either oral or placebo for 6 and was using the at 6 months and 1 yr after the had a mean age of yr with for a mean duration of There was no significant between treatment and placebo groups at any and the incidence of was similar between associated with disease is a common clinical are treated with of indeterminate such as Treatment with failed to in this The editorial the importance of large clinical for common such as chronic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesiologySame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207