Deriving SAR Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithms and Soil Drainage Classification for Boreal Peatlands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eighty percent of global peatlands are distributed across the boreal and subarctic regions, storing an estimated 30% of earth’s soil organic carbon (1,016 to 1,105 Gt C) despite representing only about 3% of the global land surface. The accumulation of C in peatlands generally depends on hydrologic conditions that maintain saturated soils and impede rates of decomposition. Boreal Peatlands have provided rich reservoirs of stored C for millennia. However, with climate change, warming and drying patterns across the boreal and arctic are resulting in dramatic changes in ecosystems and putting these systems at risk of changing from a C sink to a source. Recent changes in climate including earlier springs, longer summers and changes in moisture patterns across the landscape, are affecting wildfire regimes of the boreal region including intensity, severity and frequency of wildfires. This in turn has potential to cause shifts in successional trajectories. Understanding how these changes in climate are affecting peatlands and their vulnerability to wildfire has been a focus of study of the research team since 2009. Soil moisture is one variable which can provide information to understand wildfire behavior including the depth of peat consumption in these wildfires but it also has a direct effect on post-fire successional trajectories. Further it is needed to understand methane emissions from peatlands. To develop the soil moisture retrieval algorithms, we studied a range of boreal peatland sites (bogs and fens) stratified across geographic regions from 2012-2014. We developed soil moisture retrieval algorithms from polarimetric C-band (5.7 cm wavelength) synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data. Peatlands have low enough aboveground biomass (<3.0 kg/m2) to allow this shorter wavelength SAR to penetrate the canopy to reach the ground surface. Data from over 60, 4 ha sites were collected over 3 seasons from Alaska and Michigan USA and Alberta Canada. Both multi-linear regressions and general additive models (GAM) were developed. Using both polarimetric SAR parameters that are sensitive to vegetation structure and parameters most sensitive to surface soil moisture in the models provided the best results. GAM models were tested in an independent study area, Northwest Territories (NWT), Canada. The sites of NWT were sampled in 2016-2019 coincident to Radarsat-2 polarimetric image collections. The high accuracy results will be presented as well as methods developed to use multidate C-band data from Sentinel-1 to classify soil drainage (well drained to poorly drained) in recently burned peatlands. These products are being used in a fire effects and emissions model, CanFIRE, as we parameterize it for peatlands; as well as the Functionally-Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES) to understand the effects of wildfire and hydrology on peatland ecosystems. Characterization and quantification of boreal peatlands in global C cycling is critical for proper accounting given that peatlands play a significant role in sequestering and releasing large amounts of C. The ability to retrieve soil moisture from C-band SAR, therefore, provides a means to monitor a key variable in scaling C flux estimates as well as understanding the vulnerability and resiliency of boreal peatlands to climate change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".