MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4235419377 · doi:10.22215/etd/2017-11813

The Effects of Penta-Brominated Diphenyl Ether (penta-BDE, BDE-99) on Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK293) Cells

2017· dissertation· en· W4235419377 on OpenAlexafffund
Mary Daniel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAntioxidantChemistryReactive oxygen speciesPolybrominated diphenyl ethersEnzymeBiochemistryOxidative stressDiphenyl etherPollutantOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Individuals are exposed to toxic chemicals on a daily basis.Some toxic chemicals produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), which contribute to protein modification and the accumulation of protein carbonyl groups.The antioxidant response to ROS involves the binding of nuclear factor-erythroid 2 subunit-related transcription factors (NFE2L or Nrfs) to antioxidant response elements (AREs)/electrophile response elements (EpREs), located in the promoter and enhancer regions of antioxidant and detoxification enzymes.Activation of the AREs/EpREs pathway by Nrf proteins, in response to pentabrominated diphenyl ether (penta-BDE, BDE-99) flame retardant, was observed.Protein damage (as assessed protein carbonyl assays), lipid damage (as assessed by oxidation assays), and the activation of the beta-galactosidase enzyme occurred as a results of penta-BDE treatment.These results provide insight into how penta-BDE a) initiates the antioxidant response, b) damages proteins and lipids through ROS and c) increases betagalactosidase activity.iii x

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact→French-language works237,207→