Ni Uptake by a Green Alga. 1. Validation of Equilibrium Models for Complexation Effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Short-term (< 60 min) internalization fluxes (J(int)) by the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii were measured in the presence of a variety of ligands forming hydrophilic (citric, diglycolic, or nitrilotriacetic acids), amphiphilic (Suwannee River fulvic and humic acids), and hydrophobic (oxine, diethyldithiocarbamate) Ni complexes. Free nickel concentrations, ranging from 10(-10) to 10(-3) M, were evaluated by thermodynamic modeling and by a resin exchange technique. Ni internalization appeared to occur via a single transport site that was characterized by a conditional stability constant (pH 6.0, I = 10(-2) M) of 10(5.1) M(-1). In the presence of humic substances, Ni uptake could be quantitatively predicted on the basis of Ni2+ concentrations for two algae: C. reinhardtii and Chlorella kesslerii. In the presence of the hydrophobic ligands, an increase in permeability was observed due to the formation of neutral, lipophilic complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".