MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235434021 · doi:10.1163/187124108x426691

Contributors

2008· article· en· W4235434021 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueChurch History and Religious Culture · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChurch historyMedieval historyClassicsTheologyHistoryHebrewPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Church History and Religious Culture Secular 1%men in the Documents for Late Medieval Religious 1%men Volume 88 2008Church History and Religious Culture Editor-in-Chief WimJANsE Book Review Editor Jan Wim BursMAN Board of Editors Theo CLEMENS Bas TER HAARROMENY Alastair HAMILTON Scott MANDELBROTE Marit MONTEIRO Andrew PETTEGREE Judith POLLMANN Peter RAEDTS Advisory Board Urs Altermatt, Universitat Freiburg, Brouria Bitton-Ashkelony, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Reinhard Bodenmann, Universitat Bern, Callum G. Brown, University of Dundee, Simon Ditchfield, University of York, Mark Edwards, Christ Church, Oxford, Andrew Colin Gow, University of Alberta, Mark Greengrass, University of Sheffield, Kaspar von Greyerz, Universitat Basel, R.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChurch History and Religious CultureSame topicReformation and Early Modern ChristianityFrench-language works237,207