MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235470633 · doi:10.2118/2008-145

Enhanced Gas Recovery: Factors Affecting Gas-Gas Displacement Efficiency

2008· article· en· W4235470633 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S.S.K. Sim, A.T. Turta, A.K. Singhal, B.F. Hawkins

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationLibrary scienceDownloadCitation impactComputer scienceOperations researchWorld Wide WebEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper is a part of a series of papers on results of Enhanced Gas Recovery (EGR) research conducted at the Alberta Research Council during 2003–2007. In this Joint Industry Project (JIP), the soundness of the concept of gas-gas displacement for enhancing gasrecovery was investigated via laboratory investigations, compositional modeling and economic analyses. The results of Phase I, gas/gas displacement tests conducted at relative high pressure and temperature (70 °C and 6.2 MPa) in 4 cm diameter 30 cm long Berea core were recently reported1,2. In the second phase (2004–2005) of the JIP, the main targets were low pressure volumetric (closed) reservoirs, in advanced stages of exploitation and also, gas bearing strata overlaying oil sand intervals. Pressure maintenance of a depleting gas reservoir by waste gas injection can serve to (1) arrest the decline in gas production rate, prevent pre-mature well abandonment and increase ultimate recovery (2) discourage the advance of aquifer (ifpresent) into the gas zone, and (3) in the case of "Gas-Over- Bitumen" situations, mitigate declining reservoir pressure during natural gas production to enable exploitation of the underlying oil sands. One example of a field application of this EGR technology was the GRIPE Project operated by Paramount Resources during 2005–2006. A series of gas/gas displacement tests was conducted at room temperature and at pressures between 0.7–3.5 MPa in the presence of connate water in 4 cm diameter × 2 m long sand-packs. Experimental parameters, such as nature of the injection gas, displacement pressure and displacement rate were systematically varied to study their effect on the displacement efficiency. Numerical simulations of the experimental results were also conducted to gain better understanding of the interrelationship between the different variables. The laboratory results showed that, during low velocity displacement of methane by flue gas in a homogeneous linear sandpack, molecular diffusion has a dominating effect on the recovery ofmarketable methane. Reasonable values of molecular diffusion coefficient for different gas/gas displacement conditions were obtained by matching the experimental test results with numerical simulation. In spite of anticipated adverse effects of mixing between displaced and displacing gas due to molecular diffusion under low pressure and low flow velocity conditions, incremental recoveries of marketable methane under the experimental conditions were encouraging and suggest that EGR by gas-gas displacement can prolong the productive life and increase natural gas recovery from many volumetric gas reservoirs. Introduction Alberta currently has about 42,000 gas pools, which are in different stages of exploitation and many of them are approaching the end of their production life. The main goal for the second phase of our Joint Industry Project was to investigate enhanced gas recovery from low pressure volumetric (closed) reservoirs, in advanced stage of exploitation and also, from gas bearing strata overlaying oil sand intervals. Pressure maintenance of a depleting gas reservoir by waste gas injection can serve to (1) arrest the decline in gas production rate, prevent pre-mature well abandonment and increase ultimate recovery (2) discourage the advance of aquifer (if present) into the gas zone, and (3) in the case of "Gas-Over-Bitumen" situations, mitigate declining reservoir pressure during natural gas production to enable exploitation of the underlying oil sands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207