Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Toronto Section’s May meeting co-organized by Peter Armstrong and Tony Meerakker was held on 23May at Ontario Place Cinesphere. The Cinesphere was the first IMAX screen in a multiseat theatre environment. The Section was honored with the attendance of Patricia and David Keighley, IMAX chief quality officer gurus, and Denis Tremblay, senior research scientist also from IMAX. Three of Toronto’s societies were also represented: SMPTE, the Audio Engineering Society, and Canadian Society of Cinematographers (CSC). The outstanding number of 234 registered attendees included 105 from SMPTE, 58 from AES, 36 from CSC, and 35 friends. Patricia and David Keighley provided a history of IMAX and display technologies. Tremblay discussed audio technologies at IMAX; Glenn Shaver, Ontario Place, Manager of Transformation, spoke of the renovation side of the Cinesphere transformation; and Nancy Rowland, Ontario Place general manager, spoke of the current Ontario Place revitalization plans. Cinesphere offers a unique and immersive IMAX theatre experience for the screening of films in digital laser and 70-mm film technologies. After the meeting, Cinesphere showed the 70-mm, 18-min IMAX film <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">North of Superior</i> , originally released in 1971
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it