Bibliographic record
Abstract
O regime monopolista operado com tarifas pelo custo do serviço permitiu ao sistema elétrico mover-se em um círculo virtuoso de expansão com tarifas cadentes durante décadas. Esse círculo rompeu-se no último quartil do século passado, quando mudanças no contexto econômico criaram fortes pressões sobre os custos setoriais. Deslanchada no governo FHC, a liberalização do mercado elétrico foi interrompida no governo Lula criando dois paradoxos: 1) custos técnicos baixos, porém tarifas elevadas; 2) margem de reserva elevada, contudo o risco de racionamento de energia é permanente. Esses problemas têm sua origem nas inconsistências do mercado de energia. Dar continuidade ao processo de liberalização do mercado elétrico é condição sine qua non para que o risco recorrente de racionamento seja removido e o sistema elétrico volte a operar em um círculo virtuoso de expansão.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".