MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Liberalização interrompida

2015· article· en· W4235499547 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista USP · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBusiness and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberalizationElectricityQuarter (Canadian coin)RationingSine qua nonContext (archaeology)MonopolyEconomicsVirtuous circle and vicious circleElectricity marketGovernment (linguistics)Market economyBusinessMacroeconomicsEconomic growthEngineeringPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O regime monopolista operado com tarifas pelo custo do serviço permitiu ao sistema elétrico mover-se em um círculo virtuoso de expansão com tarifas cadentes durante décadas. Esse círculo rompeu-se no último quartil do século passado, quando mudanças no contexto econômico criaram fortes pressões sobre os custos setoriais. Deslanchada no governo FHC, a liberalização do mercado elétrico foi interrompida no governo Lula criando dois paradoxos: 1) custos técnicos baixos, porém tarifas elevadas; 2) margem de reserva elevada, contudo o risco de racionamento de energia é permanente. Esses problemas têm sua origem nas inconsistências do mercado de energia. Dar continuidade ao processo de liberalização do mercado elétrico é condição sine qua non para que o risco recorrente de racionamento seja removido e o sistema elétrico volte a operar em um círculo virtuoso de expansão.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.455
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.001 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it