MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4235603960 · doi:10.3747/co.19.1150

Corrigendum: A Personalized Approach to Treatment: Use of egfr Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Canada

2012· erratum· en· W4235603960 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Vera Hirsh, B. Melosky, Glen Goss, Donald G. Morris, W. Morzycki

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2012
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsCancer Care Nova ScotiaUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of CalgaryMcGill UniversityDalhousie UniversityRoyal Victoria HospitalOttawa HospitalBC Cancer AgencyMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTyrosine kinaseLung cancerProtein-Tyrosine KinasesPersonalized medicineCancer researchBioinformaticsCancer treatmentCellTyrosine-kinase inhibitorOncologyCancerInternal medicineGeneticsReceptorBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the article’s Acknowledgments, the company that Anna Christofides represents should have been listed as New Evidence [...]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Oncology→Same topicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations→French-language works237,207→