An intelligent front end for secondary power distribution system design
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development and use of an expert-system (ES)-based intelligent front end (IFE) for radial-type electric power secondary distribution system (single-phase/three-phase, overhead/underground) design is described. The design is based on minimizing the total annual cost (TAC) of owning and operating the system, subject to specified voltage drop and dip criteria. A rule-based, goal-driven, backward chaining ES shell, VP-Expert, is used to create the IFE and interface it with relational database (dBASE) files on transformer data and transmission line data. The IFE has a very friendly user interface and makes use of a dialog method to communicate with the user. Menus are used to ask for user inputs. The IFE approach is illustrated by means of an example problem involving secondary distribution system design in an urban area. A sample dialog generated during a typical consultation session is presented. The advantages of using an expert system shell as an IFE to existing database files maintained by electric utility companies for secondary distribution system design are discussed.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it