MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235661415 · doi:10.1177/000842980002900219

Comptes rendus / Reviews of books: Exposition of the Psalms Desiderius Erasmus Dominic Baker-Smith, editor Collected Works of Erasmus, 63 Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997. 1xxii + 305 p. Spiritualia and Pastoralia Desiderius Erasmus John W. O'Malley, editor Collected Works of Erasmus, 70 Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998. v+465 p. Controversies Desiderius Erasmus Guy Bedouelle, editor Collected Works of Erasmus, 83 Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998. 1vii + 198 p

2000· article· en· W4235661415 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Nicholas Terbstra

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsErasmus+Exposition (narrative)ClassicsArtSociologyMedia studiesArt historyLiteratureThe Renaissance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Religion/Sciences ReligieusesSame topicReformation and Early Modern ChristianityFrench-language works237,207