MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235704634 · doi:10.24198/mh.v9i2.22674

PEMBENTUKAN IDENTITAS HIBRID TOKOH IMIGRAN DALAM ROMAN LANDNAHME KARYA CHRISTOPH HEIN

2020· article· id· W4235704634 on OpenAlexaff
Wedar Pahala Lingga, N. Rinaju Purnomowulan, Muhamad Adji

Bibliographic record

VenueMetahumaniora · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Methods and Impacts
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artikel ini berjudul “Pembentukan Identitas Hibrid Tokoh Imigran dalam Roman Landnahme Karya Christoph Hein”. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengemukakan pembentukan identitas hibrid tokoh imigran dalam Roman Landnahme Karya Christoph Hein. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif dan deskriptif. Penenlitian ini menggunakan teori hibriditas Bhabha (1994) dan integrasi imigran Heckmann (2015). Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah (1) tokoh mengalami pe-liyan-an karena ia seorang imigran, (2) adaptasi tokoh dengan budaya Jerman yakni melalui pengaitan diri dengan masa lalu dan peniruan budaya lain, dan (3) identitas hibrid yang dimanifestasikan tokoh yakni menggunakan dialek campuran dalam berkomunikasi. Penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa identitas adalah konsep yang cair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetahumanioraSame topicEducational Methods and ImpactsFrench-language works237,207