Index

Citation (2019), "Index", Supporting Entrepreneurship and Innovation (Advances in Library Administration and Organization, Vol. 40), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-067120190000040014 Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited Copyright © 2019 Emerald Publishing Limited INDEX Academic librarians business librarians, 60 questionnaire, 150–151 statements for participants, 150 supporting campus innovation and entrepreneurship, 150 See also Business librarians Academic libraries, 8, 22, 42, 46–51, 56–57, 124, 125, 137 drafting mission statements, 41 future research, 82 limitations, 82 literature review, 68–69 makerspace survey, 85–88 methodology, 70 mission statements, 38–39, 41 physical aspects of makerspaces, 80–81 population, 70 programming and marketing, 82 results, 70 staffing and patrons, 81–82 survey analysis, 71–80 survey design, 70 Academic library staffing models community partnerships, 60–62 curriculum support and campus outreach, 57–60 entrepreneurship studies, 56–57 library spaces, 62–64 Access services, 9 ACRL Excellence in Academic Libraries Award, 51 Administration, 141 Administrative staff, 160 Advanced management, 175 Advances in Library Administration and Organization (ALAO), 85 ALA/Harwood Public Innovators Lab for Libraries, 129 Alabama Entrepreneurship Research Network (AERN), 60 American Library Association (ALA), 37, 41 Assessment, 124 assessment tools, 23–26 space, 30–31 status quo, 177 Assessment Librarian, 147 Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (1996), 159 Association of Academic Health Sciences Libraries, 154 Association of African Universities (AAU), 90 Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL), 37, 42, 123 Association of Research Libraries (ARL), 67–68, 154 Attendees’ perceived impact of conference, 128 methodology for attendee survey, 128 survey results, 128–130 Audience identification, 155–156 Big data, 174, 176 Boilerplate document, 39 Book Aid International (BAI), 100 Brainwriting, 11 Bruno Library, 60 Building campus relationships, 148 Business, 36, 44, 136 Business librarians, 62, 116, 124–127, 137–138 differences, 127 embedding into classroom, 58 fundraising/development, 127 liaison librarian, 63 organizational change, 127 relationship building as, 57–58 similarities, 127 See also Academic librarians Business of Starting and Sustaining an Academic Conference (2016), 125 California State University, Northridge (CSUN), 136 Incubator, 146 Oviatt Library, 140 Task Force, 145–146 California State University, San Bernardino, Coworking Project, 64 CANVAS method, 190 Carrel desks, 28 Ceiling project, 155 Change management, 176 Civil society, 101 Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA), 161 Clinical trials, 161 CMI, 155 Collaboration, 123, 139 spaces, 23, 28–29 strategic, 173 university library, 105 Collaborative Librarianship, 123 Commercial enterprises, 127 Commercialization, 138 Committee charge, 156 Commonwealth Library Association (COMLA), 90 Communal tables, 23, 28–29 Communication between university libraries and SMEs, 97–99 university libraries’ communication structures, 103–105 Community engagement. See University outreach programs kitchen, 136–137 leaders, 105–106 library, 108 Community partnerships, 60 AERN, 60 business librarians, 62 EBV, 61 embedding into entrepreneurial hub, 61–62 Small Business Development Center collaboration, 60–61 Company philosophy, 44–45 Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), 185 Computer experts, university libraries partnering with, 106 Computer labs, 23, 29–30 Conference, 116–117 attendees perceived impact, 128–130 content topics by, 119–123 Conference for Entrepreneurial Librarians, 2, 116, 128, 180 Consortium of Tanzanian University and Research Libraries (COTUL), 92–93 Consortium of Uganda University Libraries (CUUL), 90, 92, 94–95, 99, 104 Content analysis distribution of library types, 118–119 methodology for, 117–118 results, 118 Continuing education efforts, 174–176 Copyright, 139 laws, 137–138 Core technologies, 43, 44, 51–52 Cost containment, 125 Course evaluations, 177 Coworking Project on Campus at California State University, San Bernardino, 64 Creative Media Studio (CMS), 136, 140 events, 142 facilities, 141–142 instruction, 142 marketing, 143 organizational culture, 141 services, 141 staffing, 140–141 steps for, 143 student assistants, 143 technology, 142 Crossover learning, 145 Curriculum design, 177 Curriculum support and campus outreach, 57 academic business librarians, 60 embedding into classroom, 58 entrepreneurship, engineering, and innovation, 58 relationship building as business librarian, 57–58 rising of entrepreneurship librarian, 59 Data analysis skills, 174 Data Librarian, 136 Data literacy, 140 Data-driven community decisions, 176 Design thinking, 2, 8–10, 14, 177 challenges, 17–18 defining, 11 evaluation, 12 Grand Valley State University, 9 ideation, 11 identification, 14 implementation, 10–12 KDL, 8–9 leadership benefits, 15–17 as leadership practice, 13 lesson plan, 14 mini-workshop, 15 prototyping, 12 reflection, 15 research/understanding/empathizing, 10–11 teams and flexibility, 12–13 Design Thinking for Libraries toolkit , 10 Design Thinking to Meet Real World Needs , 17 Digital literacy classes, 142 Digital makerspace, 31 Digitizing research and innovation information, 101 Directory of Open Access Repositories (DOAR), 103 Discourse analysis, 39 Discovery center, 154 appoint planning committee, 156 committee charge, 156 governance, 157–158 healthcare, 160–162 identify audience, 155–156 innovation librarian, 159 libraries innovation team, 159 planning, 155 professional staff, 159–160 service identification, 156–157 space, 157 staffing, 158–159 story, 155 support and administrative staff, 160 Doing Business 2018 , 185 E-channel, 159 Eastern and Southern Africa Centres of Excellence project, 108 Egg-like seating, 28 Electronic document supply services (EDSS), 92 Electronic Information for Libraries (eIFL), 100 Electronic Information for Libraries Network (eIFL.net), 94, 104 Embedded business librarians, 139 Embodied learning, 145 Employment options, 178 Engineering, 58 Entrepreneur(ial), 1, 123, 125–128 activities for librarians, 175 characteristics, 172 curriculum, 155 education, 170 field, 37 librarian, 138 library, 180 literacy, 179 process, 137 skills training, 174 Entrepreneurial librarian education continuing education filling in gaps, 174–176 developing forward-thinking organizational culture, 180 employable outcomes, 178–180 entrepreneurship, 171–172 LIS education, 170–171 LIS programs, 176–178 skills requirement, 173–174 trends impacting LIS curricula, 172–173 Entrepreneurial librarian evolution, 137 business or entrepreneurial librarian, 137–138 changes in instruction, 138 collaboration, 139 collection development, 139 new literacies, 139 role of librarian, 139–140 Entrepreneurial Librarians (EntreLib). See Business librarian Entrepreneurial librarians. See Business librarians Entrepreneurialism, 180 Entrepreneurism, 51 Entrepreneurship, 1–3, 22, 30, 58, 137, 171–172, 185, 187 activity supporting, 56 attendees perceived impact of conference, 128–130 common topics across conferences, 123–125 conference, 116–117 entrepreneurs vs. entrepreneurial librarians, 127–128 interdisciplinary nature of, 62 issues specific to non-academic libraries, 125–126 librarian, 59 in libraries, 116 methodology for content analysis, 117–118 presentation topics changed over time, 117 publications and additional activities, 132 results of content analysis, 118–123 trial and error characteristics of, 171 Entrepreneurship Bootcamp for Veterans with Disabilities (EBV), 61 Entrepreneurship in American Higher Education , 116 Europe 2020 strategy, 186 Events, 142 Expanded library makerspace, 143 building and promoting, 146–148 importance, 145–146 models of makerspaces, 144 principles, 146 rationale for university makerspace, 145 Experiential learning, 170–171, 177 Exploitation, 137 Exploratory research design, 95 Fiscal responsibility, 15 Floor plan + walkthrough method benefits and costs, 23–26 sample space survey, 24 seat counts, sweeps, and Suma, 24 sticky notes and whiteboard data gathering, 25 surveys, interviews, and focus groups, 25–26 Focus groups, 25–26 Forced response, 70 Formal learning, 145 Foundational documents, 36 Freestanding makerspace, 144 From Vision to Implementation (2011), 120 Funding agencies, university libraries partnering with, 107–108 Fundraising/development, 125, 127 Gamification, 188 GApp Lab, 155–156, 159 Geographic domain, 43–44 Governance, 157–158 Government, university libraries partnering with, 107 Grand Valley State University, 9 Green spaces, 23, 27–28, 30 Healthcare, 155, 160 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), 159 Health market research, 161 Health sciences librarians, 160 libraries, 155, 157 Healthcare discovery centers, 160–162 Higher education, 185 Hope Fox Eccles Health Library, 154 Ideation, 11, 177 Imagine the Next (2016), 122 Incorporating educational theory, 138 Informal learning, 145 Information consultant, 179 literate society future, 170 providers, 92 resource sharing, 94 technology, 93 Information and communication technology skills, 174 Information and Innovation: A Natural Combination for Health Sciences Libraries (Shipman & Ulmer), 155 Information Communication Technology (ICT), 94 Innovation, 1–3, 51, 58, 175, 187 ecosystem, 144 hubs, 109 librarian, 159 librarian job description, 165 Innovation and creativity academic librarians supporting campus innovation and entrepreneurship, 150–151 challenges, 148–149 CMS, 140–143 evolution of entrepreneurial librarian, 137–140 expanded library makerspace, 143–148 library literature, 136 Inspiration, 177 Inspiration, Innovation, Celebration (2009), 119 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 160 Institutional repositories (IR), 93–94, 103 Institutional Review Board (IRB), 25 Intellectual property, 146–147 Interdisciplinary approach, 63 International Association of Technological University Libraries (IATUL), 90, 100 International Federation of Library Association–Building Strong Libraries (IFLA-BLA), 100 International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA), 90 International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 160 Interviews, 25–26 Intrapreneurship projects, 194 iSpace at University of Arizona Library, 63–64 Iterative process, 138, 177 “Just in case” approach, 173 Kent District Library (KDL), 8–9 staff surveys at, 16 Tyrone Township branch, 15 Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs), 180 Kolb’s theory on experiential learning, 170, 177 Land-grant partnership system, 95 Leader(ship), 174–175 benefits, 15–17 community, 105–106 Learning, 170–171 crossover, 145 embodied, 145 experiential, 170–171, 177 formal, 145 informal, 145 peer-based crucible, 145 project-based, 189–190 self-directed, 145 Learning Commons, 137, 141–143 computer lab in, 29–30 of Oviatt Library, 140 Lego buckets and tables, 27 Lesbian, Gay, Transsexual Bisexual and Intersexual subject (LGTBI subject), 194 Libhub, 93 Librarians, 176 embedded business, 139 entrepreneurial activities for, 175 health sciences, 160 role, 139–140 See also Academic librarians; Business librarians; Entrepreneurial Librarians (EntreLib) Librarianship, 129, 178 Libraries, 2, 8, 56, 60–61, 69, 92, 136, 154, 157–158, 175 distribution of library types, 118–119 entrepreneurship in, 116 health sciences, 155, 157 mission, 41, 143 non-academic, 125–126 public, 8, 68, 108 school, 68 staff, 3 See also Academic libraries; Ugandan University libraries; University libraries Libraries innovation team (LIT), 159 Library and information science (LIS), 170–171, 185 domains and knowledge cores, 188 employable outcomes, 178–180 entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship by projects and strategic lines, 194 goals and focus, 185–187 intrapreneurship projects, 194 leadership, 8, 13, 174 literature, 56 methodology, 187–189 mission, 148 operating dynamic, 189–191 programs, 176–178 projects, 191, 193, 195–196 results, 191–194 staff, 141 students and projects per academic year, 192 teaching contents and participants, 187–189 trends impacting LIS curricula, 172–173 Library makerspace, 145–146 building and promoting, 146–148 principles, 146 Library spaces, 62 Cline Library at Northern Arizona University, 62–63 Coworking Project on Campus at Cal State, San Bernardino, 64 iSpace at University of Arizona Library, 63–64 supporting university goals and outcomes, 22–23 Library Town Hall presentation, 144–145 “Library type” field, 118 Literacy, 179 Maker Ecosystem, 144 Makerlearning, 137 Makerspaces, 23, 27, 30, 68, 144, 147, 161 advisory board, 148 characteristics of, 2 funding, 77, 79 location, 73 machines and devices, 73, 74 marketing, 74–75 noise in, 71–72 origination of makerspace plan/idea, 77, 79–80 patron fee, 79–80 patrons, 77, 78 and permission policies, 75–76 physical aspects, 80–81 programming within, 75, 76 size, 71 staffing, 73–74 statistics collection, 76–77 survey, 85–88 uniqueness, 75, 76 usage distribution, 77, 79 user receptiveness, 77, 79 Makerspaces for Libraries Survey (Bagley), 70 Market research, 137–138 Marketing, 143 of makerspaces, 74–75 programming and, 82 MaRS scenario, 62 Media, 100 university libraries partnering with, 106–107 Medical devices, 160 Medical fabrication laboratories, 161–162 Medical Innovation, 155 Medical Library Association, 154 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), 158 Mini-makerspace, 143 Mini-workshop, 15 Mission statements, 36–37, 45 of business schools, 38–39 of colleges and universities, 38 company philosophy, 44–45 components, 42–43 core technologies, 44, 51–52 drafting, 41 geographic domain, 43–44 list of academic libraries, 46–51 literature review, 37 methodology, 41–42 principal products/services, 43 survival, growth, or profit, 44 target audience of, 40 target customer, 42 Money making, 126 Multidisciplinary field of entrepreneurship, 37 Multimedia production, 142 Multiple literacies, 176 National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (2017), 161 National Entrepreneurship Librarians (NEL), 59 National Institutes of Health, 160 National Library of Medicine (NLM), 154 National Network of Libraries of Medicine (NNLM), 154 Nevada Small Business Development Center (NSBDC), 60–61 New Space, 73 Nexus Collaborative Learning Lab, 157 Noise in makerspace, 71–72 Non-academic libraries, 125–126 Nonprofessional library bodies, 100 university library collaborations with, 105 Northern Arizona University, Cline Library at, 62–63 Online mission statement, 40 Open Archives Initiative–Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH), 94 Open Society Institute (OSI), 94 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 184 Organizational change, 122, 127–128, 174 change principle, 136 culture, 141 culture development, 180 structures between university libraries and SMEs, 97–99 Origination of makerspace plan/idea, 77, 79–80 Our Enduring Values (Gorman, Michael), 178 Outdoor spaces, 27–28 Outreach to community, 124, 125 Outreach to faculty, 125 Oviatt Library, 145–146 at California State University, Northridge, 2 makerspace, 144 Participants, statements for, 150 Partnership, 108, 123 Patents, 137–139 searching, 140 Patrons, 81–82 Peer-based crucible learning, 145 Permission policies, 75–76 Physical library collection, 139 Planned obsolescence, 149 Pod-like seating, 28 Pop up creative spaces, 27 Principal products/services, 43 Process cycle, 177 Professional development opportunities, 176 Professional library bodies, 99–103 university library collaborations with, 105 Professional staff, 159–160 Programming within makerspaces, 75, 76 and marketing, 82 Project management, 124, 187 training, 173 Project Management in Documentation Units, 186 Project-based learning (PBL), 189–190 Prototyping, 12, 145 activity, 140 Public health initiatives, 176 Public image, 43, 45 Publications and additional activities, 132 Purpose (mission element), 36, 51 Rationale for university makerspace, 145 Re-Envisioning the MLS: Issues, Considerations, and Framing report, 172–173 Re-Think It: Libraries for New Age, 180 Real Learning Connections project, 179 Refreshing teaching methods, 171 Regional Medical Library (RML), 154 Relationship building as business librarian, 57–58 Research and innovation (R&I), 90, 93 Research centers, university libraries partnering with, 108–109 Revenue, 105–106, 108 School libraries, 68 Seat counts, 24 Self-concept, 43, 45, 51 Self-directed learning, 145 Services, 141 identification, 156–157 “Shark Tank” competition, 191 Simulation centers, 161 Skills, 175 identifying with entrepreneurship, 178 requirement, 173–174 Small and medium enterprises (SMEs), 90–92, 100–101 in agricultural sector, 96 communication and organizational structures between university libraries and, 97–99 respondents, 105 shared mutual visions and policies of Ugandan University libraries, 97 Small Business Development Center collaboration, 60–61 Social entrepreneurs, 176 Social Entrepreneurship in Action (2013), 121 Social service skills, 176 Society of College, National and University Libraries (SCONUL), 92 Soft skill developments, 170 Software designers, 100 Solo spaces, 23, 28, 30 Space(s), 22–23, 26, 157 assessment, 30–31 assessment tools, 23–26 case study, 29–30 collaboration, 28 communal tables, 28 design for student entrepreneurs, 22 green, 27–28 library spaces supporting university goals and outcomes, 22–23 makerspaces, 27 outdoor, 27–28 planning, 2 recommendations, 31 solo, 28 Spain, LIS in, 185–196 Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library (EHSL), 2–3, 154–155, 165 Spirit of innovation, 175 Staffing, 140–141, 158–159 of makerspaces, 73–74 models, 2 and patrons, 81–82 Stakeholders, 136 Standards and beliefs (mission element), 36, 51 Standing Conference for Eastern, Central and Southern African Libraries (SCECSAL), 90 Standing Conference of African National and University Librarians (SCANUL), 90, 92, 100 State Agricultural University System, 95 Statistics collected by makerspaces, 76–77 Status quo assessment, 177 Steelcase, 8, 13 Sticky notes, 25 Strategic collaboration, 173 Strategic leadership, 95 Strengthening Innovative Library Leaders training program (SILL training program), 175 Student assistants, 143 Student entrepreneurs, design for, 22 Suma, 24 Support and administrative staff, 160 Survey analysis, 71 capacity, 72 equipment and materials, 72–73 makerspace funding, 77, 79 makerspace location, 73 makerspace machines and devices, 73, 74 makerspace patron fee, 79–80 makerspace usage distribution, 77, 79 makerspace user receptiveness, 77, 79 makerspaces and permission policies, 75–76 marketing of makerspaces, 74–75 noise in makerspace, 71–72 origination of makerspace plan/idea, 77, 79–80 programming within makerspaces, 75, 76 size of makerspace, 71 staffing of makerspaces, 73–74 statistics collected by makerspaces, 76–77 typical patron of makerspaces, 77, 78 uniqueness of makerspaces, 75, 76 Surveys, 25–26 design, 70 Sustainability, 125 Sustainability principles, 146 Swedish Program for ICT in Developing Regions project (SPIDER project), 94 Sweeps, 24 Take Risks/Embrace Change (2014), 121–122 Target customer, 42–43 Teaching contents and participants, 187–189 innovation projects, 186 Tech-Hardware (Tech-H), 72 Tech-Software (Tech-S), 72 Technology, 105, 170 transfer offices, 38 Technology commercialization unit, 155–156 3D printing 3D printers, 142 workshops, 142 Tinkering, 145 Trademarks, 137–138 Traditional librarianship curricula, 173 Trial and error characteristics of entrepreneurship, 171 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 160 Uganda Christian University (UCU), 96 Uganda Library and Information Association (ULIA), 90, 99 Uganda Martyrs University (UMU), 96 Ugandan University libraries, 91 communication and organizational structures between SMEs and, 97–99 literature review, 91–95 methodology, 95–96 partnership program, 90–91, 96–97 shared mutual visions and policies, 97 university library collaborations with professional library bodies, 99–103 United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship (USASBE), 180 University libraries, 90–91, 94–96 collaborations with professional and nonprofessional library bodies, 105 collaborations with professional library bodies, 99–103 communication structures, 103–105 community leaders, 105–106 computer experts, partnering with, 106 funding agencies, partnering with, 107–108 government, partnering with, 107 media, partnering with, 106–107 modern university library, 139 mission and visions of, 103 partnership program, 90 public and community libraries, 108 research centers, partnering with, 108–109 University of Arizona Library iSpace, 63–64 University of Utah, Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, 2–3, 154–155, 165 University makerspace, 145 University of North Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG), 116 University of Toronto Libraries (UTL), 61 University outreach programs, 105 User experience (UX), 8, 17 Utah Academic Library Consortium, 154 Virtual library collection, 139 Whiteboard data gathering, 25 Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), 191 Book Chapters Prelims Introduction: Supporting Entrepreneurship and Innovation Part 1 Tools for Entrepreneurship and Innovation Not What You Expected: Implementing Design Thinking as a Leadership Practice Do Your Library Spaces Help Entrepreneurs? Space Planning for Boosting Creative Thinking Part 2 Library Activities Related to Entrepreneurship and Innovation Mission Statements, Innovation, and Academic Libraries: A Qualitative Study Academic Library Staffing Models in Support of the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem: An Examination of Case Studies Academic Libraries in 2018: A Comparison of Makerspaces within Academic Research Libraries New Partnerships for Ugandan University Libraries: A Shift from a Reactionary to Proactive Approach of Research and Innovation Information Services for SMEs The Status of Entrepreneurship in Libraries: Content Analysis and Assessment from the Conference for Entrepreneurial Librarians Part 3 Case Studies of Libraries Supporting Entrepreneurship and Innovation Innovation and Creativity: A New Facet of the Traditional Mission for University Libraries Creating Partnerships between Health Innovators and Librarians: A Story Part 4 Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Library Education Educating the Entrepreneurial Librarian From the Classroom to the Library: The Experience of Entrepreneurship and Teaching Innovation in the Area of Library and Information Science in Spain About the Authors Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.