MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Syrups

2007· other· en· W4235723255 on OpenAlexaff
R. E. Hebeda

Bibliographic record

VenueKirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet, Metabolism, and Disease
Canadian institutionsIngredion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlucose syrupMaltodextrinHigh-fructose corn syrupCorn syrupChemistryFood scienceMaltoseSugarSucroseStarchFructoseHydrolysisRaw materialCarbohydrateChromatographyOrganic chemistrySpray drying

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Corn sweeteners, maple syrup, and molasses, all commercially available syrups, are concentrated solutions of carbohydrate. These products, produced for a variety of food and nonfood applications, are in some cases also available in a dry form. Corn sweeteners are prepared from hydrolyzed starch and include dextrose, high fructose corn syrup, regular corn syrup, and maltodextrin, which all have in common the raw material source, general methods of preparation, and many properties and applications. Dextrose, the common or commercial name forD‐glucose, is available as a syrup or as a pure crystalline solid. High fructose corn syrup is produced by the partial enzymatic isomerization of dextrose. Corn syrups and maltodextrins are clear, colorless, viscous liquids prepared by hydrolysis of starch to solutions of dextrose, maltose, and higher molecular weight saccharides. Maple syrup, like corn syrup, is a nutritive sweetener produced as a concentrated carbohydrate (sucrose) solution. Molasses is a syrup produced as a by‐product of sugar manufacture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2350.142

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical TechnologySame topicDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207