MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Syrups

2007· other· en· W4235723255 on OpenAlex
R. E. Hebeda

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet, Metabolism, and Disease
Canadian institutionsIngredion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlucose syrupMaltodextrinHigh-fructose corn syrupCorn syrupChemistryFood scienceMaltoseSugarSucroseStarchFructoseHydrolysisRaw materialCarbohydrateChromatographyOrganic chemistrySpray drying

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Corn sweeteners, maple syrup, and molasses, all commercially available syrups, are concentrated solutions of carbohydrate. These products, produced for a variety of food and nonfood applications, are in some cases also available in a dry form. Corn sweeteners are prepared from hydrolyzed starch and include dextrose, high fructose corn syrup, regular corn syrup, and maltodextrin, which all have in common the raw material source, general methods of preparation, and many properties and applications. Dextrose, the common or commercial name for D ‐glucose, is available as a syrup or as a pure crystalline solid. High fructose corn syrup is produced by the partial enzymatic isomerization of dextrose. Corn syrups and maltodextrins are clear, colorless, viscous liquids prepared by hydrolysis of starch to solutions of dextrose, maltose, and higher molecular weight saccharides. Maple syrup, like corn syrup, is a nutritive sweetener produced as a concentrated carbohydrate (sucrose) solution. Molasses is a syrup produced as a by‐product of sugar manufacture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it