MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235735774 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11678

Traveling Wave Laser Model for Circuit Simulation

2016· dissertation· en· W4235735774 on OpenAlexfundno aff
John Rasmussen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpiceWave modelTransmission lineTraveling waveComputer scienceLaserSimulationElectronic engineeringEngineeringPhysicsTelecommunicationsOpticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis examines current modeling of lasers with the aim to justify the Traveling Wave Model (TWM) as the best alternative for an accurate laser model that is not too costly computationally. The goal is not just to have the best model but to have one that can be incorporated into a SPICE-like optical simulator for commercial application. After reviewing other models with specific attention paid to the classic Rate Equation Model (REM) and briefly overviewing the Transmission Line Model (TLM), it presents the TWM details. This model is compared with the REM and we discover that even with enhancements made to the REM once we require a more accurate and detailed model the TWM provides a simpler, more physical model that is computationally comparable and more easily refined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207