MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4235762493 · doi:10.1017/s0714980800014586

CJG volume 19 supplement 1 Cover and Front matter

2000· article· en· W4235762493 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anne Martin-Matthews, Rosemary Vanderkamp, Elaine Gallagher, Joan E. Norris

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAging and Gerontology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of GuelphUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of WaterlooHealth and Social Services Centre University Institute of Geriatrics of SherbrookeUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, revue trimestrielle dotee d'un comite de lecture; est l'organe de l'Association canadienne de gerontologie.La revue publie des articles sur le vieillissement dans les disciplines suivantes: biologie, gerontologie educative, sciences de la sante, psychologie, sciences sociales et politiques et pratiques sociales.Les manuscrits sont acceptes ou refuses sur la recommendation des redacteurs representant chacune des cinq sections de l'ACG, et apres consultation avec les membres du comite de lecture.Les manuscrits sont normalement soumis a l'approbation des redacteurs et de deux lecteurs ou plus.Les opinions exprimees dans la revue n'engagent que leurs auteurs. Les articles sont resumes et indexes dans Abstracts in Social Gerontology, Agelnfo CD-ROM, Ageline, Australasian Medical Index, Bibliographic internationale de la litterature periodique, Bibliographic internationale des recensions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6430.395

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement→Same topicAging and Gerontology Research→French-language works237,207→