KRIMINALISASI DALAM UU NO. 24 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PENANGGULANGAN BENCANA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana merupakan salah satu sumber hukum pidana positif, oleh karena UU tersebut merumuskan Bab Ketentuan Pidana mulai Pasal 75 sampai dengan Pasal 79. Berdasarkan ketentuan pidana tersebut akan dapat diindetifikasi perbuatan-perbuatan apa saja yang merupakan tindak pidana penanggulangan bencana. Lebih lanjut, apabila ada yang melakukan perbuatan yang dilarang itu maka aparat peradilan pidana (polisi, jaksa, hakim, dan pemasyarakatan) akan melakukan penindakan dan penjatuhan pidana. Dengan demikian, UU No. 24 Tahun 2007 telah melakukan kriminalisai terhadap beberapa perbuatan yang terkait dengan masalah kebencanaan. Namun, sekalipun telah diundangkan bukan berarti persoalan telah selesai. Kebijakan kriminalisasi dalam UU No. 24 tahun 2007 tetap harus dianalisis guna mengantisipasi perbuatan-perbuatan kriminal sehubungan dengan penanggulangan bencana di Indonesia. Kajian yang dapat digunakan dalam rangka menganalisis kebijakan kriminalisasi dalam UU No. 24 tahun2007 adalah kajian politik hukum pidana. Kata kunci: Ketentuan Pidana, Kriminalisasi, Tindak Pidana PenanggulanganBencana, Politik Hukum Pidana.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.088 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".