Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Atomoxetine dose influences rate of adverse effects An analysis of five randomised trials involving a total of 447 children confirms that slow dose titration reduces the incidence of adverse effects of atomoxetine ( J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007; 46:566‐72). Two initiation regimens were evaluated: once‐daily dosing to achieve the target dose of 1.2mg per kg per day over three days or twice‐daily dosing to reach the target dose over two weeks. During the first two weeks, fast titration was associated with a higher rate of adverse effects, including decreased appetite (14 versus 8 per cent) and somnolence (14 versus 4 per cent); by contrast, slow titration was associated with a higher frequency of headache (7 versus 17 per cent). Buprenorphine versus methadone for heroin dependence Buprenorphine/naloxone may be safer than methadone as maintenance therapy for heroin dependence – but is it as effective? Swedish specialists compared the two treatments in a maintenance programme for 96 people self‐referred with heroin dependence (mean use 10 years) ( Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:797‐803). The dose of buprenorphine was stepped up to a maximum of 32mg daily; if higher doses were needed, patients were switched to methadone, with further dose escalation if required. After a 24‐day induction phase and six months' maintenance treatment, there was no difference between retention rates (78 per cent), though 20 of 48 patients randomised to buprenorphine switched to methadone. Eighty per cent of urine samples were free of illicit drugs, with no difference between treatments, and there were no differences in addiction severity scores at the end of the study period. Adverse reaction rates were similar. Differences in brain metabolism in antidepressant and CBT responders In people with depression, the response to venlafaxine or cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is associated with similar changes in brain glucose metabolism – but there are differences too, say Canadian researchers ( Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:778‐88). Using PET scans, they showed that in 24 patients with major depressive disorder the response to either therapy was associated with a reduction in glucose metabolism in the orbitofrontal and left medial prefrontal cortex, together with an increase in glucose metabolism in the right occipital‐temporal cortex. However, CBT was uniquely associated with increases in glucose metabolism in Brodmann's area 32, a decrease in the thalamus, a decrease in Brodmann's area 29 (increased with venlafaxine) and an increase in Brodmann's areas 20 and 21 (decreased with venlafaxine). The authors suggest further investigation of pretreatment differences in brain glucose metabolism may help to predict which is the more effective treatment. Aromatherapy for agitation Lavender inhalation reduces agitation in patients with dementia, say Hong Kong investigators ( Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007;22:405‐10). Their three plus three week crossover trial in 70 patients found that lavender inhalation significantly reduced scores of agitation compared with baseline whereas there was no change with placebo (sunflower oil inhalation). There were also improvements in aggressive behaviour, irritability and dysphoria, and patients with vascular dementia did rather better than those with Alzheimer's disease. No adverse effects were reported. Depression increases non‐adherence risk People who report being depressed are more likely to avoid taking prescribed medication on grounds of cost, according to a US study ( Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64:602‐8). Interviews with 13 835 elderly people and people with disabilities using the US Medicare programme revealed that 13 and 44 per cent respectively reported being depressed in the previous year. Of those with disabilities, 38 per cent of those reporting depression and 22 per cent of those not doing so said they had not taken their medicine as prescribed because of cost (missed or reduced doses, or did not have a prescription dispensed). Among the elderly, the corresponding figures were 19 and 12 per cent. Adjusting for risk factors, depression increased the risk of cost‐related non‐adherence by 70 per cent in people with disabilities and 40 per cent among the elderly. Venlafaxine metabolite on the horizon? As the patent life of venlafaxine nears its end, researchers are establishing the efficacy of its active metabolite desvenlafaxine ( J Clin Psychiatry 2007;68:677‐88). An eight‐week dose‐ranging study in 461 adults with depression found that desvenlafaxine 100‐400mg daily was associated with response rates of 45‐51 per cent compared with 35 per cent with placebo. Remission rates were 28‐32 per cent and 19 per cent respectively. Adverse events were similar in nature to those of the parent compound. Gabapentin for dysautonomia Dysautonomia (‘autonomic storms’) associated with traumatic brain injury causes significant morbidity and is difficult to manage. Neurologists from Australia and Denmark now believe that gabapentin may offer a new treatment option ( J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:539‐41). They report six patients with dysautonomia following severe brain injury in whom gabapentin (300‐600mg two to three times daily) reduced paroxysms, spasticity and posturing. Conventional treatment (analgesia, intrathecal baclofen, clonidine, morphine, sufentanil, bromocriptine, metoprolol) was partially successful. In one patient, treatment with sodium valproate was ineffective. The authors say that these results cannot be explained solely by gabapentin's effect on neuropathic pain. Generic versus branded antiepileptic drugs The thorny issue of generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs has been raised again, this time by neurologists from the UK and The Netherlands ( Lancet Neurology 2007;6:465‐8). They argue that, although there are large potential savings from switching to a generic drug, it is still unclear whether they outweigh the risks to patients. European rules mean that the equivalence of generic and branded drugs lies within the range 80‐125 per cent. In the treatment of epilepsy, where small changes in dose may be needed to balance seizure control and adverse effects, this range may allow clinically significant differences. Generic substitution should be tested in clinical trials before being accepted into clinical practice, they conclude. Psychiatrists' writing failing GPs Discharge letters and written advice about patients with dementia from old‐age psychiatrists to GPs falls below acceptable standards, a Yorkshire study has shown ( Psychiatric Bull 2007;31:176‐8). A 2002 audit found that psychiatrists in the East Riding communicated poorly to their colleagues in primary care about their use of antipsychotics in patients with dementia. A repeat audit in 2005, after the Royal College of Psychiatrists published management guidance on the use of antipsychotics in patients with dementia, found the situation had deteriorated. Over two‐thirds of discharge letters did not state the indication for treatment, 91 per cent failed to mention the recommended three‐monthly review and 91 per cent did not provide advice on the duration of treatment or the need for review. Coincidentally, the audit also revealed that benzodiazepines had been prescribed without appropriate advice to GPs about reviewing treatment. Improving gait in Parkinson's disease Freezing, small steps and instability in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease are difficult to treat. There is evidence that both dopaminergic and adrenergic function may be implicated, prompting French neurologists to test the efficacy of methylphenidate ( J Neurol Neursurg Psychiatry 2007;78:470‐5). Assessment of 17 patients on video after three months' treatment with methylphenidate 1mg per kg three times daily showed, in the absence of levodopa, a reduction in postural instability and freezing, improved walking and reduced sleepiness and symptom scores. The levodopa‐induced improvement was also greater after methylphenidate treatment. No cardiovascular adverse effects were found; adverse effects included dry mouth, anorexia and weight loss. NSAIDs do not prevent Alzheimer's disease NSAIDs are not effective as primary prevention of Alzheimer's disease (AD) – in the short‐term, at least ( Neurology 2007;68:published early online). The AD Anti‐inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT) compared naproxen (a non‐COX selective NSAID), celecoxib (a COX‐2 selective NSAID) and placebo in 2528 patients aged over 70 years. The trial was stopped because of concerns about possible adverse cardiovascular effects but there was also a non‐significant trend for an increased i
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".