MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235815709 · doi:10.1139/b00-131

The 5S rRNA gene units in the native New World annual<i>Hordeum</i>species (Triticeae: Poaceae)

2000· article· en· W4235815709 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bernard R. Baum, Douglas A. Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHordeum vulgareBiologyHordeumTriticeaeCladisticsBotanyPoaceaePhylogenetic treeGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have employed a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based approach to amplify 5S rDNA sequences from 20 accessions representing five Hordeum species native to the Americas. Sequence analysis of 88 clones revealed three sets of orthologous sequences in Hordeum pusillum Nutt. and two sets in the other four species. The long H1 unit class, previously known in Hordeum bulbosum L., Hordeum marinum L. s.l., Hordeum murinum L. s.l., Hordeum spontaneum Boiss., and Hordeum vulgare L., was found also in Hordeum depressum (Scribner &amp; Smith) Rydberg and in H. pusillum; however, the majority of the sequences fell within two new classes of orthologous sequences. Sequences of the long H2 unit class were found in four species but not in H. depressum. Sequences of the long Y2 unit class were found in all five species. The long H2 and long Y2 unit classes appear to be unique to this group of five, mostly annual, North and South American species. Cladistic analysis of the orthologous sequences from the species with the long H1 unit class places the long H1 sequence of Hordeum flexuosum Steudel in the same clade with H. murinum, whereas H. depressum is more closely related to the perennial species, Hordeum bogdanii Wilenski and H. bulbosum. This association differs from previously described species relationships and it may be that the gene tree differs from the species tree. A cladistic analysis of paralogous sequences of the two new unit classes defined in this study together with the long H1, the long Y1 and the long X2 unit classes uncovered in previous work in Hordeum, was performed. Based upon these analyses, we hypothesize that the possible order of divergence was first the division into two branches leading to the long H1 unit class and the long H2 unit class; the lineage leading to the long H2 class was further divided to give rise to branches leading to the long Y1, the long Y2 and the long X2 classes.Key words: 5S rDNA, genomes, haplomes, unit classes, Hordeum, Triticeae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsFrench-language works237,207