MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235824576 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.12315488.v1

WITHDRAWN

2020· preprint· en· W4235824576 on OpenAlexaff
Bhavana Deore, Kathleen L. Sampson, Thomas Lacelle, Nathan Kredentser, J. Lefebvre, Luke Steven Young, Joseph Hyland, Rony E. Amaya, Tanha Jamshid, Patrick R. L. Malenfant, Hendrick W. de Haan, Chantal Paquet

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPickering emulsions and particle stabilization
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityCarleton UniversityNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
Keywords3D printingPolymerizationMaterials scienceComputer sciencePolymerNanotechnologySelection (genetic algorithm)Functional polymersPhase (matter)Process engineeringChemistryArtificial intelligenceComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The content did not adhere to figshare's terms and conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5990.534

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicPickering emulsions and particle stabilizationFrench-language works237,207