MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4235846238 · doi:10.3138/r134-35m1-716x-n232

CARNIVALISM IN POSTWAR AUSTRIAN- AND GERMAN-JEWISH LITERATURE – EDGAR HILSENRATH, IRENE DISCHE, AND DORON RABINOVICI

2007· article· en· W4235846238 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Robert F. Lawson

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Colonialism and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanJudaismArtReligious studiesArt historyHistoryPhilosophyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carnivalism in Postwar Austrian- and German-Jewish Literature —Edgar Hilsenrath, Irene Dische, and Doron Rabinovici Robert Lawson Mikhail Bakhtin's theory of carnivalism has been a useful tool for understanding medieval and renaissance literature, in particular for locating subversive textual elements undermining traditional social hierarchies (church and state). In addition, critics have noted carnivalesque characteristics such as role reversal and grotesque realism in twentieth century narratives by authors like Angela Carter. Susan Vice describes how Carter's 1986 short story the "Kitchen Child" satirizes societal conventions by portraying the servants of an English country house as much more refined than their masters (Introducing Bakhtin 189). This article demonstrates how carnivalism, as outlined by Bakhtin in his two critical studies Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics (1963) and Rabelais and his World (1965), has become an important aesthetic model in post-Shoah German- and Austrian-Jewish literature. In order to show the widespread nature of carnivalism, this analysis examines a disparate group of writers who differ in terms of age, nationality, and gender. It focusses on works by the Holocaust sur-vivor Edgar Hilsenrath (Der Nazi und der Friseur, 1977), the Austrian Doron Rabinovici (Suche nach M, 1997), and the German-American Irene Dische ("Fromme Lügen," 1989, and "Eine Jüdin fur Charles Allen," 1989) – the latter an American-born author considered here, as in other studies, as a German-Jewish writer because most of her stories, originally in English, are translated and published in Germany and examine issues central to the concerns of the Jewish community in that country. It shows how each of these three writers uses the central elements of carnivalism – including masquerade, role reversal, and grotesque realism – both as a means of expressing the incomprehensible nature of twentieth-century chaos and atrocities and as a vehicle for social criticism. With regard to the latter point, it focusses on how postwar Austrian- and German-Jewish writers have used carnivalism to sharpen their critical perspective on the Holocaust, to focus on the guilty past of German and Austrian society, and to highlight anti-Semitism and the Jewish identity crisis. Bakhtin describes the nature of medieval and renaissance carnival life as "free, full of ambivalent laughter, blasphemy, the profanation of all that was holy, disparagement and obscenity, and familiar contact with everyone [End Page 37] and everything" (Dostoevesky 130). As this quote indicates, the carnival was a celebration with two major goals. The first was to establish an atmosphere of carnivalistic mésalliances in which people, thoughts, and values would no longer be divided or distanced and hierarchies would disappear, largely because of the use of masquerade (Dostoevesky 123). The second was to criticize all that was held to be authoritative or holy. In the German- and Austrian-Jewish context one can apply the idea of car-nivalistic mésalliances and, as this analysis also shows, the antiauthoritarian critical function of the carnivalesque to the relationship between Jews and non-Jews. Anti-Semitism has long been an obstacle to Jewish integration or mésalliances in the diaspora and to overcoming the notion of Jewish German/Austrian and non-Jewish German/Austrian as binary opposites. Since the Holocaust, of course, any Jewish sense of belonging to German or Austrian society has been even more difficult, for some impossible. The critic Dan Diner describes postwar German- and Austrian-Jewish/non-Jewish relations as a negative symbiosis (9). The term refers to the division between Jews and non-Jews in contemporary Austria and Germany, whereby both sides share the common history of the Holocaust, but view it from radically different perspectives. With respect to post-Shoah literature the carnivalistic mésalliances would refer to the way in which the narrative strategies associated with carnivalism explore the feasability of dialogue between the two sides in this opposing mutuality. On the subject of the Holocaust one might wonder how carnivalism, a trope associated with laughter and festivity, can be brought to bear on a horrific cata-strophe like the Shoah and its aftermath. The answer becomes clearer when one considers the difficulties faced by postwar writers in developing an appropriate literary aesthetic that would capture what appears to be incomprehensible and indescribable, namely the mass...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0110.025
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSeminar A Journal of Germanic Studies→Same topicGerman Colonialism and Identity Studies→French-language works237,207→