MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235857345 · doi:10.1139/w01-003

A common precursor for the three subunits of<scp>L</scp>-glutamate oxidase encoded by<i>gox</i>gene from<i>Streptomyces platensis</i>NTU3304

2001· article· en· W4235857345 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chien‐Yuan Chen, Wen-Tung Wu, Chang‐Jen Huang, Mei‐Huei Lin, C. H. Chang, Huei-Jen Su Huang, Jiuan‐Miaw Liao, Ling‐Yun Chen, Yu-Tien Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGABA and Rice Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiochemistryOpen reading frameGeneBiologyPeptide sequenceNucleic acid sequenceMolecular biologySignal peptideGlucose oxidaseAmino acidOxidase testChemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A segment of DNA containing the L-glutamate oxidase (gox) gene from Streptomyces platensis NTU3304 was cloned. The entire nucleotide sequence of the protein-coding portion consisting of 2130 bp (710 codons, including AUG and UGA) of the cloned DNA fragment was determined. The gox gene contained only one open reading frame (ORF) which coded for a 78-kDa polypeptide, the precursor of active extracellular Gox. Mature Gox is composed of three subunits, designated as α, β, and γ, with molecular masses of 39, 19, and 16 kDa, respectively. Analyses of the N-terminal amino acid sequences of the subunits revealed that the order of subunits in the precursor polypeptide encoded by the ORF, from N-terminus to C-terminus, is α–γ–β. The presence of the flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)-binding motif place Gox as a member of the flavoenzyme family. Furthermore, a negative effect of glucose on the biosynthesis of Gox was observed when it was used as carbon source.Key words: L-glutamate oxidase, gox gene, signal peptide, DNA sequence, flavoenzyme, pIJ702 vector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicGABA and Rice ResearchFrench-language works237,207