MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235865969 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db210901

Services sector holds hope for China's economy

2016· other· en· W4235865969 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaTertiary sector of the economyForeign direct investmentTrade in servicesCommodityBusinessGoods and servicesInternational tradeInvestment (military)Service (business)EconomicsInternational economicsQuarter (Canadian coin)Economic policyEconomyTrade barrierFinancePoliticsMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subject China's services sector. Significance Preliminary economic data for the first quarter of 2016 show that a buoyant service sector helped minimise the negative impact on GDP growth resulting from China's industrial slowdown, with services growing 7.6% compared with overall GDP growth of 6.9%. A key question is to what extent services will be able to maintain this supportive role, given the many challenges that face their continued expansion. Impacts The importance of exports as a driver of economic growth will recede with the shift from manufacturing to services. Import demand growth will weaken, as services require less energy, fewer raw materials and fewer intermediate goods than industry. The combined import and export effect will dampen China's impact on the world economy and dampen global commodity demand. Buoyant service sector growth will, however, encourage greater foreign direct investment in services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicGlobal Health and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207