MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235874921 · doi:10.1109/iccad.1996.568904

An efficient approach for moment-matching simulation of linear subnetworks with measured or tabulated data

2002· article· en· W4235874921 on OpenAlexaff
Guowu Zheng, Qi‐Jun Zhang, M. Nakhla, Ramachandra Achar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoment (physics)Computer scienceMatching (statistics)Method of moments (probability theory)AlgorithmSubnetworkComputationStencilFrequency domainDomain (mathematical analysis)MathematicsComputational scienceMathematical analysisPhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a new moment-generation algorithm for efficient simulation of linear subnetworks characterized by measured or tabulated data using moment-matching techniques. The subnetwork moments are computed by performing an integration in time-domain on the measured data. The proposed technique is more accurate as it relies on integration as compared to the previously published approaches which depend on the differentiation of measured data in frequency-domain for computation of moments. Using the new moment-generation technique, the CFH (Complex Frequency Hopping) algorithm has been extended to handle measured subnetworks. Also a generalized stencil for measured data for inclusion in circuit simulators and to facilitate efficient moment-generation has been presented. Examples and comparison with conventional simulations are provided. The method is accurate while it is faster than the conventional approach by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207