MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235895572 · doi:10.1353/jeu.2017.0020

New Directions

2017· article· en· W4235895572 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Heather Snell

Bibliographic record

VenueJeunesse Young People Texts Cultures · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEditorial boardLibrary scienceCurriculumChinaDiversity (politics)Media studiesSociologyPolitical scienceLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Directions Heather Snell The year 2017 has brought some significant changes to Jeunesse. In addition to hiring a new managing editor, Lauren Bosc, and a new copy editor, Claire Wilkshire, we have moved the preceding managing editor, Larissa Wodtke, to a position on the editorial board and welcomed four new editors: Sally Campbell Galman, Associate Professor in the Department of Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst in the United States; children’s and Victorian literature scholar Jennifer Harrison, who teaches at East Stroudsburg University in Pennsylvania, US; Haifeng Hui, Associate Professor in the School of Foreign Languages at Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, China; and Jo Lampert, Professor of Education at La Trobe University in Melbourne, Australia. These new editors have not only enriched an already vibrant culture at Jeunesse but have also added to our expertise, further enabling us to work with authors from various disciplines and aiding in editing submissions from those parts of the world previously not represented on the board. While in the past our board has been dominated by Canadian scholars working in English departments and—more recently—by one scholar outside Canada working in the social sciences, we can now proclaim much greater interdisciplinarity and geographical diversity. This shift has happened gradually and with great care on the part of Jeunesse’s editors. Having begun as an academic, peer-reviewed journal working within a bilingual national frame—Canadian Children’s Literature (CCL)/Littérature canadienne pour la jeunesse (LCJ)—Jeunesse has moved to an international and interdisciplinary scope, a transition that was neither something that could happen overnight nor something we wanted to force prematurely. Rather, the development of Jeunesse as a journal fundamentally different from its predecessor has proceeded in a way that seems natural in terms of the submissions we have been receiving since 2008 and the changing makeup of our editorial board. It took some time before scholars [End Page 1] working outside English departments felt comfortable considering Jeunesse as a venue for their work, and it has taken time to amass the expertise required to edit international and interdisciplinary submissions. As these have gradually expanded to include disciplines and fields that it had not been possible to publish under the umbrella of a national, predominantly Anglophone journal, and as editors with varying backgrounds and specializations have come and gone over the last nine years, Jeunesse has undergone a succession of small changes. Taken together, these changes represent a major transformation. It is our hope that we will continue to receive both interdisciplinary submissions and submissions from a range of disciplines and national contexts that explore topics, themes, and texts pertinent to young people. This last Jeunesse issue of 2017 also marks a collaboration with the Association for Research in Cultures of Young People (ARCYP), which hosted a conference in October 2016 entitled Youngsters: On the Cultures of Children and Youth (Youngsters 2016). The conference, which attracted a wide range of artists, activists, international scholars, and professionals working within the humanities and social sciences, convened at Simon Fraser University’s downtown Harbour Centre campus in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Rarely have I seen so many different disciplines represented at a conference. That such a wide range of approaches emerged at a conference run by a small, albeit growing, association is even more remarkable. Youngsters 2016 exemplifies the ongoing work of consolidating research on young people’s texts and cultures to clear a space for inter- and cross-disciplinary dialogue and research collaborations. Reflecting the diversity of the participants, some of the papers presented at Youngsters 2016 were interdisciplinary productions in and of themselves. The opportunity to witness collaboration among scholars from different discursive realms and, in some cases, different countries, was, at least for me, a refreshing change from those conferences that express a desire for interdisciplinarity and transnationalism but for some reason or another could not achieve it in practice. In the second editorial of this issue, outgoing ARCYP President Stuart Poyntz and incoming ARCYP President Naomi Hamer reflect on this landmark conference and introduce the three articles that came out of it and that are now included in this issue...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJeunesse Young People Texts CulturesSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207