MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235947817 · doi:10.24124/2017/54764

Social worker's role in an adult protection agency

2017· dissertation· en· W4235947817 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michelle Wheelhouse

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicElder Abuse and Neglect
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPracticumVulnerable adultAgency (philosophy)Government (linguistics)HarmSocial workNova scotiaSocial WelfareNeglectAdult educationPsychologyMedicinePolitical sciencePublic relationsMedical educationNursingPedagogySocial psychologyPsychiatrySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My graduate practicum was completed at Adult Protection Services, Department of Health and Wellness in the Government of Nova Scotia office located at Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. Adult Protection Services receives referrals for suspected adult concerns related to an individual that may be living at immediate or significant risk. The risk can be due to self-neglect, unsafe living conditions, or the adult may be experiencing abuse by others that may result in serious harm. Mental and physical incapacity often contribute to the referrals made to Adult Protection. The principal objective of my practicum was to learn about the role of a social worker in delivering Adult Protection Services. In addition, my practicum learning objectives included goals that built my knowledge of community networks and I developed my understanding of how Adult Protection Services worked collaboratively with other organizations from an interagency perspective to resolve Adult Protection concerns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0220.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElder Abuse and NeglectFrench-language works237,207