MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235955858 · doi:10.1017/s175577391700008x

EPR volume 9 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

2017· article· en· W4235955858 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Political Science Review · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaMcGill University
FundersUniversity of California, IrvineCentral European UniversityNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensUniversity of OxfordEuropean University InstituteUniversitat Pompeu FabraLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of WashingtonUniversità degli Studi di MilanoPrinceton UniversityHarvard UniversityVanderbilt University
KeywordsFront coverCover (algebra)Volume (thermodynamics)Front (military)Action (physics)Political scienceContent (measure theory)EngineeringPhysicsMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From 'one right way' to 'one ruinous way'? Discursive shifts in 'There is no alternative' Astrid Sville Identifying the determinants of electoral integrity and administration in advanced democracies: the case of Britain Alistair Clark The (non) particularities of West European radical left party supporters: comparing left party families -ERRATUM Giorgos Charalambous and Iasonas Lamprianou

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it