MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236055673 · doi:10.1017/jbr.2019.138

JBR volume 58 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

2019· article· en· W4236055673 on OpenAlexafffund
Jeffrey Collins, Sandra Den Otter, Amy Harris, Paul Westover, Stefan Brown, Maureen Garvie, Virginia Vandenberg, Ian Mclaughlin, Stephen Brooke, Elizabeth Ewan, Matt Houlbrook, Joanna Innes, David K. Lambert, Ted Mccormick, Paul Monod, Cecilia Morgan, Cynthia J. Neville, Christopher Otter, Susan D. Pennybacker, Erika Rappaport, Barbara Travers, Michelle Tusan, James Vernon, Rachel Weil, Don Akenson, Jordanna Bailkin, Tim Barringer, Richard Bourke, Christopher C. Brown, Déborah Cohen, Tarnya Cooper, Brian Cowan, Elizabeth Elbourne, Margot C. Finn, Katherine L. French, Deborah E. Harkness, Ben Jackson, Maryanne Kowaleski, Philippa Levine, Margaret McGlynn, Bernadette Meyler, Craig Muldrew, Melanie J. Newton, Kate Retford, Ethan H. Shagan, Nigel Smith, Miles Taylor, Robert Tittler, Selina Todd, Kathleen Wilson, Anna Clark, Paul D. Halliday, Elizabeth Prevost, Stephanie Barczewski, Michael Silvestri, Andrew Muldoon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of British Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of TorontoDalhousie UniversityUniversity of GuelphYork UniversityQueen's University
FundersUniversity of CambridgeMcGill University
KeywordsFront coverVolume (thermodynamics)Cover (algebra)Front (military)Action (physics)Computer scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.060

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of British StudiesSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207